Determination of the Inaccuracies of Calculated EEG Indices.

Mariusz Borawski, Konrad Biercewicz, Jarosław Duda

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariusz BorawskiDepartment of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin, Żołnierska 49, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.

Konrad BiercewiczDepartment of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin, Żołnierska 49, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-4527

Jarosław DudaDepartment of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin, Żołnierska 49, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The data obtained as a result of an EEG measurement are burdened with inaccuracies related to the measurement process itself and the need to remove recorded disturbances. The article presents an example of how to calculate the Approach-Withdraw Index (EEG-AW) and Memorization Index (MI) indices in such a way that their inaccuracy resulting from the removal of artifacts can be periodically calculated. This inaccuracy is expressed in terms of standard deviation. This allows you to determine the reliability of the obtained conclusions in the context of examining elements in a 2D computer game created in the Unity engine.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainHumansReproducibility of ResultsEEGICAstandard deviation

Identifiers

PMID33050020

DOI10.3390/s20195715

PMCPMC7582453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.