Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33049623›Full record

ReviewCancer treatment reviews2020

Liquid biopsy in lymphoma: Molecular methods and clinical applications.

Melita Cirillo, Alexander F M Craig, Sven Borchmann, David M Kurtz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer treatment reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Liquid Biopsy in B and T Cell Lymphomas: From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Melita CirilloRoyal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia; University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Alexander F M CraigDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sven BorchmannUniversity of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine, Cologne, Germany; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Else Kröner Forschungskolleg Clonal Evolution in Cancer, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: Sven.borchmann@uk-koeln.de.
David M KurtzDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: dkurtz@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

Molecular Characterization and Personalized Approaches to Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma from Circulating Tumor DNAK08CA241076 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KURTZ, DAVID MATTHEW · 2019 to 2023
$957k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we broadly review the application of cfDNA analysis to the diagnosis and management of lymphoma. We introduce the advantages of cfDNA measurement over conventional tissue biopsy and describe how cfDNA may be utilized for both genotyping and detection of minimal residual disease. First, we discuss genotyping, beginning with differences in identifying mutations from the blood plasma vs. from circulating cells. We review the technical distinctions between PCR- and NGS-based assays and describe two important applications of NGS-based cfDNA tests, namely the identification of resistance mutations and classification of disease subtype. We discuss difficulties in genotyping diseases with low burden of tumor cells and the application of cfDNA assays in these contexts. Second, we describe the utility of ctDNA measurement in assessing MRD. We cover recent advances in the assessment of pre-treatment disease burden as a prognostic biomarker, detection of molecular response to therapy, and early detection of relapsing disease. Third, we explore select emerging areas of research in ctDNA technologies that show promise in boosting the performance of existing ctDNA-based assays. These include cell-free DNA fragment structure analysis or 'fragmentomics', epigenetic modifications, and novel circulating analytes such as tumor-educated platelets and extracellular vesicular DNA. We also discuss alternative analytes to blood plasma for tumor detection, such as urine, saliva, and stool. Finally, we present a case that highlights potential applications of ctDNA approaches to the management of patients with lymphoma, while also defining important prerequisite advances before this can be fully realized. We close with a look to the future of cfDNA applications, outlining one potential timeline and path forward towards routine clinical application.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyLymphomaMutationNeoplasm, ResidualPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACell-free DNACirculating tumor DNALiquid biopsyLymphomaMinimal residual diseasePrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID33049623
PMCPMC8043056
OpenAlexW3088618511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.