Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33049406›Full record

ArticleNew biotechnology2021

Towards a bioeconomic vision for New Zealand - Unlocking barriers to enable new pathways and trajectories.

Karen Bayne, Anita Wreford, Peter Edwards, Alan Renwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen BayneScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute), 10 Kyle Street, PO Box 29237, Riccarton, Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand. Electronic address: karen.bayne@scionresearch.com.
Anita WrefordLincoln University, P O Box 85084, Lincoln, 7647, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Peter EdwardsManaaki Whenua (Landcare Research), P.O. Box 10 345 The Terrace, Wellington, 6143, New Zealand.
Alan RenwickLincoln University, P O Box 85084, Lincoln, 7647, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been significant national interest and movement towards bioeconomic policy over the past decade. Through an examination of the current bioeconomic pathways in New Zealand, this paper outlines key barriers that transition pathways will need to overcome and factors needing development within the country's bioeconomic environment. New Zealand's strength in primary production, coupled with a market-led economy and recent green growth with low carbon policies, provide an excellent platform for bioeconomic development. However, the strength in established biological industries and lack of clearly defined vision or cohesive support for bioeconomic development provide sufficient inertia to realising the full potential. For a bioeconomy in New Zealand to flourish, a primary sector model that is cohesive and more integrated is needed to develop new niche industries and attract finance, while providing an overarching governance system to the primary industries.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyGreen Chemistry TechnologyHumansNew ZealandBarriersBioeconomyNew ZealandPrimary sectorSocioeconomicTransition pathway

Identifiers

PMID33049406
PMCPMC7547829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.