Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33049044›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Semantic similarity and machine learning with ontologies.

Maxat Kulmanov, Fatima Zohra Smaili, Xin Gao, Robert Hoehndorf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathway Analysis Interpretation in the Multi-Omic Era.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An ontology-based tool for modeling and documenting events in neurosurgery.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. From Food to Clinic: Mapping FoodOn to the UMLS to Enable Nutritional Decision Support.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxat KulmanovKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Fatima Zohra SmailiKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Xin GaoComputational Bioscience Research Center and lead of the Structural and Functional Bioinformatics Group at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Robert HoehndorfKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ontologies have long been employed in the life sciences to formally represent and reason over domain knowledge and they are employed in almost every major biological database. Recently, ontologies are increasingly being used to provide background knowledge in similarity-based analysis and machine learning models. The methods employed to combine ontologies and machine learning are still novel and actively being developed. We provide an overview over the methods that use ontologies to compute similarity and incorporate them in machine learning methods; in particular, we outline how semantic similarity measures and ontology embeddings can exploit the background knowledge in ontologies and how ontologies can provide constraints that improve machine learning models. The methods and experiments we describe are available as a set of executable notebooks, and we also provide a set of slides and additional resources at https://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/machine-learning-with-ontologies.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesMachine LearningModels, BiologicalSemanticsknowledge representationmachine learningneuro-symbolic integrationontologysemantic similarity

Identifiers

PMID33049044
PMCPMC8293838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.