ReviewPloS one2020
Maximizing cohesion and separation for detecting protein functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks.
Review in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Ensemble Classifiers for Improved Prediction of Native-Non-Native Protein-Protein Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Integration of deep learning-based histopathology and transcriptomics reveals key genes associated with fibrogenesis in patients with advanced NASH.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Article
- Molecular Modelling Hurdle in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Overlapping Structures Detection in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Using Community Detection Algorithm Based on Neighbor Clustering Coefficient.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein Function Module (PFM) identification in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PPINs) is one of the most important and challenging tasks in computational biology. The quick and accurate detection of PFMs in PPINs can contribute greatly to the understanding of the functions, properties, and biological mechanisms in research on various diseases and the development of new medicines. Despite the performance of existing detection approaches being improved to some extent, there are still opportunities for further enhancements in the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of such detection methods. Based on the uniqueness of the network-clustering problem in the context of PPINs, this study proposed a very effective and efficient model based on the Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun algorithm for detecting PFMs in PPINs. To demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed model, computational experiments are performed using three different categories of species datasets. The computational results reveal that the proposed model outperforms existing detection techniques in terms of two key performance indices, i.e., the degree of polymerization inside PFMs (cohesion) and the deviation degree between PFMs (separation), while being very fast and robust. The proposed model can be used to help researchers decide whether to conduct further expensive and time-consuming biological experiments and to select target proteins from large-scale PPI data for further detailed research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.