Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048980›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Measurement of filtration efficiencies of healthcare and consumer materials using modified respirator fit tester setup.

Kenneth D Long, Elizabeth V Woodburn, Ian C Berg, Valerie Chen, William S Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Novel Antipathogenic Agent for Nonwoven Fabric.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Consequences of FFP3 mask usage on venous blood gases.Irish journal of medical science · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth D LongDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Elizabeth V WoodburnCarle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-9949
Ian C BergDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2302-7006
Valerie ChenCarle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
William S ScottUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Illinois College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USCarle Foundation Hospital · US

Funding

Tissue microenvironment (TIMe) training programT32EB019944 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BHARGAVA, ROHIT, GASKINS, REX · 2016 to 2025
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB019944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there is unprecedented demand for personal protective equipment (PPE), especially N95 respirators and surgical masks. The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to be transmitted via respiratory droplets from asymptomatic individuals has necessitated increased usage of both N95 respirators in the healthcare setting and masks (both surgical and homemade) in public spaces. These precautions rely on two fundamental principles of transmission prevention: particle filtration and droplet containment. The former is the focus of NIOSH N95 testing guidelines, and the latter is an FDA guideline for respirators and surgical masks. While studies have investigated droplet containment to provide guidance for homemade mask production, limited work has been done to characterize the filtration efficiency (FE) of materials used in home mask making. In this work, we demonstrate the low-cost (<$300) conversion of standard equipment used to fit-test respirators in hospital and industrial settings into a setup that measures quantitative FEs of materials based on NIOSH N95 guidelines, and subsequently measure FEs of materials found in healthcare and consumer spaces. These materials demonstrate significant variability in filtration characteristics, even for visually similar materials. We demonstrate a FE of 96.49% and pressure drop of 25.4 mmH20 for a double-layer of sterilization wrap used in surgical suites and a FE of 90.37% for a combination of consumer-grade materials. The excellent filtration characteristics of the former demonstrate potential utility for emergent situations when N95 respirators are not available, while those of the latter demonstrate that a high FE can be achieved using publicly available materials.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAerosolsAir FiltersCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Equipment SafetyHealth PersonnelHumansMasksMaterials TestingOccupational ExposurePandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralRespiratory Protective DevicesSARS-CoV-2Aerosols

Identifiers

PMID33048980
PMCPMC7553287
OpenAlexW3092541804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.