Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048946›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades.

Sarah N Ruckman, Michelle M Jonika, Claudio Casola, Heath Blackmon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dismantling Chromosomal Stasis Across the Eukaryotic Tree of Life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High-density linkage maps and chromosome level genome assemblies unveil direction and frequency of extensive structural rearrangements in wood white butterflies (Leptidea spp.).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Diptera andFrontiers in ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah N RuckmanDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1583-6639
Michelle M JonikaDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1170-6418
Claudio CasolaEcology and Evolutionary Biology Interdisciplinary Program, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-1866
Heath BlackmonDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5433-4036
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Integrating theory, genomics, and comparative approaches to break barriers to the understanding of genome structure and sex chromosome evolution.R35GM138098 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BLACKMON, HEATH · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may fail in species with monocentric chromosomes after a fusion or fission, which may lead to chromosomes with no centromere or multiple centromeres. In contrast, species with holocentric chromosomes should still be able to safely segregate chromosomes after fusion or fission. This along with the observation of high chromosome number in some holocentric clades has led to the hypothesis that holocentricity leads to higher rates of chromosome number evolution. To test for differences in rates of chromosome number evolution between these systems, we analyzed data from 4,393 species of insects in a phylogenetic framework. We found that insect orders exhibit striking differences in rates of fissions, fusions, and polyploidy. However, across all insects we found no evidence that holocentric clades have higher rates of fissions, fusions, or polyploidy than monocentric clades. Our results suggest that holocentricity alone does not lead to higher rates of chromosome number changes. Instead, we suggest that other co-evolving traits must explain striking differences between clades.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCentromereChromosome SegregationChromosomes, InsectInsectaKaryotypePhylogenyPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID33048946
PMCPMC7584213
OpenAlexW3092209995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.