Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048936›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Interventions for the management of snakebite envenoming: An overview of systematic reviews.

Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Deepti Beri, Zohra S Lassi, Jagnoor Jagnoor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Core outcome set for intervention research on snakebite envenomation in South Asia.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Effect of SeveralJournal of tropical medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Snakebite Treatment in Tanzania: Identifying Gaps in Community Practices and Hospital Resources.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Snake Envenomation.The New England journal of medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soumyadeep BhaumikThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-4453
Deepti BeriThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-0334
Zohra S LassiRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jagnoor JagnoorThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-9095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSnakebite is a neglected tropical disease that leads to more than 120,000 deaths every year. In 2019, World Health Organization (WHO) launched a strategy to decrease its global burden by 2030. There is a range of issues around different interventions for the management of snakebite. Decisions around these interventions should be informed by evidence from systematic reviews (SR).

methodsAn overview of SRs was conducted by searching 12 electronic databases, PROSPERO, contacting experts and screening the bibliography of included reviews. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment (through AMSTAR-2) was done by at least two overview authors independently with discrepancies sorted by consensus. A narrative synthesis was conducted. PRINCIPLE

findingsThe overview found 13 completed SRs that has looked at various aspects of management of snakebite envenomation. There was one SR on first aid, nine on effectiveness and safety of snake anti-venom (SAV), two on drugs to prevent adverse reactions due to SAV therapy, and one on surgical interventions for management of snakebite envenomation. All, except one, SR was appraised to have critically low confidence as per AMSTAR-2 Criteria. Evidence base was restricted to few studies for most interventions. DISCUSSION: High quality evidence from SRs is required to inform guidelines and health system decisions which can bring down the burden of snakebite. The review indicates the need to fund high-quality SRs, evidence gaps and core outcome sets which can inform guideline recommendations, funding priorities for conduct of future trials. Variation in species distribution as well as intra-species variation in venom composition implies the need for conduct of region or, nation or state (sub-national) specific randomised controlled trials and SRs on different SAVs and their dosing regimens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiveninsDisease ManagementFirst AidHumansSnake BitesSnakesSystematic Reviews as TopicAntivenins

Identifiers

PMID33048936
PMCPMC7584233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.