Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048920›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Neural activity during a simple reaching task in macaques is counter to gating and rebound in basal ganglia-thalamic communication.

Bettina C Schwab, Daisuke Kase, Andrew Zimnik, Robert Rosenbaum, Marcello G Codianni, Jonathan E Rubin, Robert S Turner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bettina C SchwabDepartment of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-4836
Daisuke KaseDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6787-5862
Andrew ZimnikDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Robert RosenbaumDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-9282
Marcello G CodianniDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jonathan E RubinCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1513-1551
Robert S TurnerDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6074-4365
University of Pittsburgh · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Basal ganglia-thalamic signaling in parkinsonism and deep brain stimulationR01NS070865 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Surgery Core - NINDS Institutional Core Grants to Support Neuroscience ResearchP30NS076405 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Motor sequences and basal ganglia-cortical circuitsR01NS113817 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Functions of the Motor Cortical-Thalamic CircuitR01NS091853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS076405NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070865NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091853NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task-related activity in the ventral thalamus, a major target of basal ganglia output, is often assumed to be permitted or triggered by changes in basal ganglia activity through gating- or rebound-like mechanisms. To test those hypotheses, we sampled single-unit activity from connected basal ganglia output and thalamic nuclei (globus pallidus-internus [GPi] and ventrolateral anterior nucleus [VLa]) in monkeys performing a reaching task. Rate increases were the most common peri-movement change in both nuclei. Moreover, peri-movement changes generally began earlier in VLa than in GPi. Simultaneously recorded GPi-VLa pairs rarely showed short-time-scale spike-to-spike correlations or slow across-trials covariations, and both were equally positive and negative. Finally, spontaneous GPi bursts and pauses were both followed by small, slow reductions in VLa rate. These results appear incompatible with standard gating and rebound models. Still, gating or rebound may be possible in other physiological situations: simulations show how GPi-VLa communication can scale with GPi synchrony and GPi-to-VLa convergence, illuminating how synchrony of basal ganglia output during motor learning or in pathological conditions may render this pathway effective. Thus, in the healthy state, basal ganglia-thalamic communication during learned movement is more subtle than expected, with changes in firing rates possibly being dominated by a common external source.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAction PotentialsAnimalsBasal GangliaBrain MappingComputer SimulationDatabases as TopicFemaleGlobus PallidusMacacaMicroelectrodesMovementNeuronsReaction TimeRestThalamus

Identifiers

PMID33048920
PMCPMC7584254
OpenAlexW3092071305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.