Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048824›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

COVID-19 Outcome Prediction and Monitoring Solution for Military Hospitals in South Korea: Development and Evaluation of an Application.

JoonNyung Heo, Ji Ae Park, Deokjae Han, Hyung-Jun Kim, Daeun Ahn, Beomman Ha, Woong Seog, Yu Rang Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

JoonNyung Heo *Armed Forces Medical Command, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-6348
Ji Ae Park *Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8717-1587
Deokjae HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Armed Forces Capitol Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3203-0752
Hyung-Jun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Armed Forces Capitol Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-8864
Daeun AhnDepartment of Nursing, The Armed Forces Capitol Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6694-2920
Beomman HaArmed Forces Medical Command, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-5380
Woong SeogArmed Forces Medical Command, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5016-6103
Yu Rang ParkDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-2094
Armed Forces Capital Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has officially been declared as a pandemic, and the spread of the virus is placing sustained demands on public health systems. There are speculations that the COVID-19 mortality differences between regions are due to the disparities in the availability of medical resources. Therefore, the selection of patients for diagnosis and treatment is essential in this situation. Military personnel are especially at risk for infectious diseases; thus, patient selection with an evidence-based prognostic model is critical for them.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the usability of a novel platform used in the military hospitals in Korea to gather data and deploy patient selection solutions for COVID-19.

methodsThe platform's structure was developed to provide users with prediction results and to use the data to enhance the prediction models. Two applications were developed: a patient's application and a physician's application. The primary outcome was requiring an oxygen supplement. The outcome prediction model was developed with patients from four centers. A Cox proportional hazards model was developed. The outcome of the model for the patient's application was the length of time from the date of hospitalization to the date of the first oxygen supplement use. The demographic characteristics, past history, patient symptoms, social history, and body temperature were considered as risk factors. A usability study with the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was conducted on the physician's application on 50 physicians.

resultsThe patient's application and physician's application were deployed on the web for wider availability. A total of 246 patients from four centers were used to develop the outcome prediction model. A small percentage (n=18, 7.32%) of the patients needed professional care. The variables included in the developed prediction model were age; body temperature; predisease physical status; history of cardiovascular disease; hypertension; visit to a region with an outbreak; and symptoms of chills, feverishness, dyspnea, and lethargy. The overall C statistic was 0.963 (95% CI 0.936-0.99), and the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.976 at day 3 to 0.979 at day 9. The usability of the physician's application was good, with an overall average of the responses to the PSSUQ being 2.2 (SD 1.1).

conclusionsThe platform introduced in this study enables evidence-based patient selection in an effortless and timely manner, which is critical in the military. With a well-designed user experience and an accurate prediction model, this platform may help save lives and contain the spread of the novel virus, COVID-19.

Indexed as

Hospitals, MilitaryRisk AssessmentSoftware DesignAdultBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePandemicsPatientsPhysiciansPneumonia, ViralPrognosisappCOVID-19military medicinemodelingmonitoringoutcomepatient managementpredictionprediction modelproportional hazards modelsusability

Identifiers

PMID33048824
PMCPMC7644266
OpenAlexW3092418586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.