Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048619›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020

Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in a Genomically Guided Cancer Clinical Trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH).

Keith T Flaherty, Robert J Gray, Alice P Chen, Shuli Li, Lisa M McShane, David Patton, Stanley R Hamilton, P Mickey Williams, A John Iafrate, Jeffrey Sklar and 16 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Tumors WithJCO precision oncology · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors WithJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  13. Phase II Study of Taselisib inJCO precision oncology · 2022
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Keith T FlahertyMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3402-0478
Robert J GrayECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Biostatistics Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA.
Alice P ChenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-853X
Shuli LiECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Biostatistics Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA.
Lisa M McShaneDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-8195-3206
David PattonCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-3855-0166
Stanley R HamiltonUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8331-1052
P Mickey WilliamsFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.
A John IafrateMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jeffrey SklarYale University, New Haven, CT.
Edith P MitchellThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Lyndsay N HarrisDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
Naoko TakebeDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
David J SimsFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.
Brent CoffeyCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.
Tony FuFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.
Mark RoutbortUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-261X
James A ZwiebelDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-8789
Larry V RubinsteinDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-9720-9737
Richard F LittleDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
Carlos L ArteagaUniversity of Texas Southwestern Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.
Robert ComisECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Philadelphia, PA.
Jeffrey S AbramsDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-7787-7730
Peter J O'DwyerDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
Barbara A ConleyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
NCI-MATCH team

Funding

Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNU24CA196172 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON, Scott D Jewell · 2015 to 2026
$41.1M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
UT Southwestern NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) LAPS - Supplemental Funds YR4UG1CA233302 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Eric Gerber · 2019 to 2026
$6.4M
Yale Cancer Center NCTN LAPSUG1CA233337 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANNE C CHIANG · 2019 to 2026
$6.0M
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center LAPS Institutional CollaborationUG1CA233341 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Steven Cohen, Mitchell Edelson · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196172NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233302NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233337NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTherapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across cancer types. The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial was designed to evaluate targeted therapy antitumor activity in underexplored cancer types. Tumor biopsy specimens were analyzed centrally with next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a master screening protocol. Patients with a tumor molecular alteration addressed by a targeted treatment lacking established efficacy in that tumor type were assigned to 1 of 30 treatments in parallel, single-arm, phase II subprotocols. PATIENTS AND

methodsTumor biopsy specimens from 5,954 patients with refractory malignancies at 1,117 accrual sites were analyzed centrally with NGS and selected immunohistochemistry in a master screening protocol. The treatment-assignment rate to treatment arms was assessed. Molecular alterations in seven tumors profiled in both NCI-MATCH trial and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of primary tumors were compared.

resultsMolecular profiling was successful in 93.0% of specimens. An actionable alteration was found in 37.6%. After applying clinical and molecular exclusion criteria, 17.8% were assigned (26.4% could have been assigned if all subprotocols were available simultaneously). Eleven subprotocols reached their accrual goal as of this report. Actionability rates differed among histologies (eg, > 35% for urothelial cancers and < 6% for pancreatic and small-cell lung cancer). Multiple actionable or resistance-conferring tumor mutations were seen in 11.9% and 71.3% of specimens, respectively. Known resistance mutations to targeted therapies were numerically more frequent in NCI-MATCH than TCGA tumors, but not markedly so.

conclusionWe demonstrated feasibility of screening large numbers of patients at numerous accruing sites in a complex trial to test investigational therapies for moderately frequent molecular targets. Co-occurring resistance mutations were common and endorse investigation of combination targeted-therapy regimens.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiopsyDisease ProgressionFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33048619
PMCPMC7676882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.