Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048459›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2021

Optimizing the Therapeutic Window of Targeted Drugs in Oncology: Potency-Guided First-in-Human Studies.

Matthew J Goldstein, Malte Peters, Barbara L Weber, Charles B Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Beyond theJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Moving the needle for oncology dose optimization: A call for action.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew J GoldsteinTango Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Malte PetersMorphoSys AG, Planegg, Germany.
Barbara L WeberTango Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Charles B DavisTango Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many targeted therapies are administered at or near the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With the advent of precision medicine, a larger therapeutic window is expected. Therefore, dose optimization will require a new approach to early clinical trial design. We analyzed publicly available data for 21 therapies targeting six kinases, and four poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, focusing on potency and exposure to gain insight into dose selection. The free average steady-state concentration (C

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveCell Line, TumorClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Maximum Tolerated DoseNeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsResearch DesignAntineoplastic AgentsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33048459
PMCPMC7993318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.