Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048453›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2021

Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children's Hospital.

Timothy A Roberts, Jennifer A Wagner, Tracy Sandritter, Benjamin T Black, Andrea Gaedigk, Stephani L Stancil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy A RobertsDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Jennifer A WagnerDepartment of Pediatrics, UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Tracy SandritterDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Benjamin T BlackDepartment of Pediatrics, UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Andrea GaedigkDepartment of Pediatrics, UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Stephani L StancilDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Childrens Mercy Hospital Fellowship Program in Pediatric PharmacologyT32HD069038 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI Laura B Ramsey, Jonathan Wagner · 2011 to 2026
$3.1M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development T32 ND069038NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD069038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited evidence to support pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in children. We conducted a retrospective review of PGx testing among 452 patients at an academic children's hospital to determine the potential utility of PGx in diseases of childhood and to identify targets for future pediatric pharmacogenetic research. An actionable gene-drug pair associated with the 28 genes tested (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A or B, Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) level 1A or B, or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation and a PharmGKB level) was present in 98.7% of patients. We identified 203 actionable gene-drug-diagnosis groups based on the indications for each actionable drug listed in Lexicomp. Among patients with an actionable gene-drug-diagnosis group, 49.3% had a diagnosis where the drug was a therapeutic option and PGx could be used to guide treatment selection. Among patients with an associated diagnosis, 30.9% had a prescription for the actionable drug allowing PGx guided dosing. Three genes (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5) accounted for all the gene-drug-diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions. The most common gene-drug-diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions were CYP2C19-citalopram-escitalopram-depression 3.3% of patients tested; CYP2C19-dexlansoprazole-gastritis-esophagitis 3.1%; CYP2C19-omeprazole-gastritis-esophagitis 2.4%; CYP2D6-atomoxetine-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2.2%; and CYP2C19-citalopram-escitalopram-obsessive-compulsive disorder 1.5%. PGx could be used to guide selection of current treatment options or medication dosing in almost half (48.7%) of pediatric patients tested. Mood disorders and gastritis/esophagitis are promising targets for future study of PGx testing because of the high prevalence of these diagnoses and associated actionable gene-drug pairs in the pediatric population.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildClinical Decision-MakingCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADepressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug PrescriptionsEsophagitisFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastritisHospitals, PediatricCYP2C19 protein, humanCYP3A5 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3APrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID33048453
PMCPMC7877836
OpenAlexW3092054328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.