ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021
Reproductive Outcomes of Single Embryo Transfer in Women with Previous Cesarean Section.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of previous cesarean delivery on reproductive outcomes of assisted reproductive technology: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of previous caesarean delivery on cumulative live birth rate in IVF/ICSI cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- The association between female age and pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving first elective single embryo transfer cycle: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of previous caesarean section on reproductive and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Patients With Prior Cesarean Section After a Single Embryo Transfer in IVF/ICSI: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reproductive outcomes of patients with previous cesarean section (CS) undergoing single-embryo transfer (SET). A total of 5479 patients previously underwent CS or vaginal delivery (VD) were included. The patients with previous CS included single/double cleavage (SCT/DCT), single/double blastocyst stage embryo transfer (SBT/DBT). The comparison of reproductive outcomes between CS and VD, SET, and double-embryo transfer of CS was conducted. The main outcome measures included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), live birth rate (LBR), and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). There were no differences in CPR and LBR between patients previously underwent CS and VD, and the preterm birth rate of multiple births in patients underwent CS were significantly higher than underwent VD. As for patients underwent CS, the CPR, MPR, and LBR were lower in patients treated with SCT than DCT in IVF/ICSI cycles. The CPR and LBR of patients treated with SCT were not statistically different compared with DCT and SBT when patients' age were younger than 35 years in FET cycles, and the MPR of patients treated with SCT was lower. The CPR and LBR of patients treated with SCT were lower than DCT/SBT when patients' age were 35 years or older in FET cycles. The CPR, LBR, and CLBR of patients treated with SBT were not lower than DCT in IVF/ICSI-ET, FET, and complete cycles, but the MPR was lower. Reducing the number of embryos transferred should be considered seriously for CS. SCT under the 35 years of FET cycles is feasible. SBT is an effective strategy to reduce MPR of IVF/ICSI, FET, and complete cycles regardless of overall or age stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.