Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048311›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2021

Cone-beam computed tomography classification of the mandibular second molar root morphology and its relationship to panoramic radiographic appearance.

Takuma Funakoshi, Takuya Shibata, Kyoko Inamoto, Naoki Shibata, Yoshiko Ariji, Motoki Fukuda, Kazuhiko Nakata, Eiichiro Ariji

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takuma Funakoshi *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan. funa@dpc.agu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5423-8968
Takuya Shibata *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Kyoko InamotoDepartment of Endodontics, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Naoki ShibataDepartment of Endodontics, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Yoshiko ArijiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Motoki FukudaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakataDepartment of Endodontics, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Eiichiro ArijiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Aichi Gakuin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to clarify the relationship between the panoramic radiographic appearance and the longitudinal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) classification of root configurations of the mandibular second molar.

methodsPanoramic radiographs of 1058 mandibular second molars were classified into five types according to the number and configuration of the roots. These molars were also examined with CBCT at four levels between the pulp chamber and the root apex, and axial images perpendicular to the root axis were categorized into three patterns: single (fused root with small grooves on both buccal and lingual sides or a round root with one canal); double (two separate roots with a trabecular appearance between them); and C-shaped (root with a deep groove opening only on the lingual or buccal side relative to the opposite side). Based on these patterns and their scan levels, the CBCT root morphology appearance in each tooth unit was classified into seven groups. Relationships were investigated between these seven CBCT groups and the five panoramic root types.

resultsIn panoramic types 1 and 2 (with separate roots), 85% had roots with a double pattern (groups II and III) on the CBCT images. In panoramic types 3 and 4 (with fused roots), 85% had C-shaped CBCT patterns at the lower scan levels.

conclusionsWhen panoramic images show fused root types, CBCT examinations should be planned to clarify the root canal configuration.

Indexed as

MandibleTooth RootCone-Beam Computed TomographyMolarRadiography, PanoramicCone-beam computed tomographyC-shaped rootMandibular second molarTooth root

Identifiers

PMID33048311
OpenAlexW3092344863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.