ArticleJournal of neurology2020
Vestibular disorders: clinician ENT perspective on the need for research and innovation.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Practices in Vestibular Migraine Management Among Canadian Otolaryngologists: A National Survey.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVertigo and dizziness are a frequent reason for medical consultation. However, diagnostic and therapeutic management is sometimes limited, and clinicians are faced with many unmet needs. The purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize these needs.
methodsA questionnaire methodology was used to determine the need for innovation in vestibular disorder management. The questionnaire was sent to 19 teams in French-speaking ENT centers. We measured the concordance of the panel of experts on 56 questions related to the different vestibular pathologies encountered and the desired modalities of innovations.
resultsThirteen questions were identified as priorities. The needs expressed by the experts had better knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the main diseases encountered and the development of new treatment modalities. Particular attention was paid to inner ear imaging techniques and the development of specific electrophysiology techniques. DISCUSSION: Some of the anticipated innovations are already under development, such as new inner ear fluid imaging techniques (hydrops visualization using MRI) or in situ treatments (transtympanic dexamethasone or gentamicin injections). Others, such as new electrophysiological techniques, are still not fully developed
conclusionThis study provides a snapshot of the needs of the medical profession in vestibular disorder management. It highlights a real concern of the attending personnel, as well as a critical need to optimize the means of diagnosing and treating patients with vestibular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.