Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048197›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Preventing action slows down performance in perceptual judgment.

D Quarona, M Raffuzzi, M Costantini, C Sinigaglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D QuaronaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
M RaffuzziCognition in Action (CIA) Unit, PHILAB, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
M CostantiniDepartment of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
C SinigagliaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. corrado.sinigaglia@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-7522

Funding

Transition Grant 2015-2017-Horizon2020 PSR2015-1719CSINI_01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action and vision are known to be tightly coupled with each other. In a previous study, we found that repeatedly grasping an object without any visual feedback might result in a perceptual aftereffect when the object was visually presented in the context of a perceptual judgement task. In this study, we explored whether and how such an effect could be modulated by presenting the object behind a transparent barrier. Our conjecture was that if perceptual judgment relies, in part at least, on the same processes and representations as those involved in action, then one should expect to find a slowdown in judgment performance when the target object looks to be out of reach. And this was what we actually found. This indicates that not only acting upon an object but also being prevented from acting upon it can affect how the object is perceptually judged.

Indexed as

JudgmentPsychomotor PerformanceFeedback, SensoryHand StrengthHumansVisual PerceptionAction and perceptionCanonical neuronsGraspingVisuo-motor aftereffect

Identifiers

PMID33048197
PMCPMC7644466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.