ArticleJAMA network open2020
Family and Friend Perceptions of Quality of End-of-Life Care in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building Survey Data Infrastructure on Aging: The Legacy of NIA.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Quality of Hospices Used by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Individual Socioeconomic Factors Have a Greater Impact on End-of-Life Care Outcomes Than Regional Factors.Journal of palliative medicine · 2024Article
- Quality of End-of-Life Care for Older Adults with Dementia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2023Article
- Functional and clinical needs of older hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Effects of Medicare advantage on patterns of end-of-life care among Medicare decedents.Health services research · 2022Article
- Hospice Improves Care Quality For Older Adults With Dementia In Their Last Month Of Life.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2022Article
- Article
- Opening the black box: Evaluating the care of people with serious illness in Medicare Advantage.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- Dying with dementia in Medicare Advantage, Accountable Care Organizations, or traditional Medicare.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- Live discharge from hospice for people living with dementia isn't "graduating"-It's getting expelled.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Medicare Advantage (MA) insures an increasing proportion of Medicare beneficiaries, but evidence is lacking on patient or family perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care in MA vs traditional Medicare. Objective: To determine if there is a difference in quality of care reported by family and friends of individuals who died while insured by MA vs traditional Medicare at the end of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used the 2011 to 2017 Medicare-linked National Health and Aging Trends Study to conduct population-based survey research representing 8 668 829 Medicare enrollees. Included individuals were 2119 enrollees who died when aged 65 years or older, with quality of care reported by a family member or close friend familiar with the individual's last month of life. Analysis was conducted in July 2020. Exposures: MA enrollment at the time of death or before hospice enrollment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perception of end-of-life care was measured with 9 validated items, with the primary outcome variable being overall care rated not excellent. We conducted a propensity score-weighted multivariable model to examine the association of each item with MA vs traditional Medicare enrollment. The propensity score and multivariable model included covariates capturing demographic and socioeconomic factors, function and health, and relationship of the respondent to the individual who died. The sample was then stratified by hospice enrollment and setting of care in the last month. Results: Of 2119 people in the sample, 670 individuals were enrolled in MA at the time of death or prior to hospice (32.7%) and 1449 were enrolled in traditional Medicare (67.3%). In survey-weighted percentages, 53.6% (95% CI, 51.0% to 56.1%) were women and 43.4% (95% CI, 41.5% to 45.3%) were older than 85 years at the time of death. In the adjusted model, family and friends of individuals in MA were more likely to report that care was not excellent (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.61; P = .04) and that they were not kept informed (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.05; P = .02). For those in nursing homes, there was an estimated probability of 57.2% of respondents reporting that care was not excellent for individuals with traditional Medicare, compared with 77.9% of respondents for individuals with MA (marginal increase for those in MA, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.32; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of people who died while enrolled in Medicare, friends and family of those in MA reported lower-quality end-of-life care compared with friends and family of those enrolled in traditional Medicare. These findings suggest that, given the rapid growth of MA, Medicare should take steps to ensure that MA plans are held accountable for quality of care at the end of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.