SynthesisJAMA network open2020
Association of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 Inhibitors With Survival in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05181033 (A Phase II Randomized Trial of Lenvatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Randomized Trial of Lenvatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor (ER) Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer, Who Have Progressed on First-line Aromatase Inhibitor + a CDK4/6 Inhibitor.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of first- versus second-line CDK4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: an umbrella review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- The adverse events of CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+/ HER2- breast cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events with Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) Inhibitors among Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in combination with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The Combination of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors plus Endocrine Treatment versus Endocrine Treatment Alone in Hormone-receptor (HR)-Positive breast Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2022Pooled it
- Tucidinostat Plus Exemestane as a Neoadjuvant in Early-Stage, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.The oncologist · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of Alisertib Alone or Combined With Fulvestrant in Patients With Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancer: The Phase 2 TBCRC041 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA oncology · 2023Trial
- CCNE1 and PLK1 Mediate Resistance to Palbociclib in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Trial
- Palbociclib with Fulvestrant or Letrozole in Endocrine-Sensitive Patients with HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Detailed Safety Analysis of the Randomized PARSIFAL Trial.The oncologist · 2023Trial
- Targeting PFKFB3 to enhance CDK4/6 inhibitor response in ER+ breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Review
- Targeting PFKFB3 to enhance CDK4/6 inhibitor response in ER+ breast cancer.Research square · 2026Article
- Real world experience with cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer in India.PloS one · 2026Article
- Exploring the effect of Duffy status on patients with breast cancer receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Treatment patterns and outcomes in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy: a US real-world cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Survey of Health Care Providers on Social Determinants of Health and Treatment Decision-Making for Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor Degraders for Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
- A Canadian real-world, multi-center, prospective, observational study assessing the treatment duration, the treatment sequence, and the overall survival for patients treated with endocrine therapy ± targeted therapy in HR + HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: One of the most recent treatment regimens used for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer is treatment with the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapy (ET). Objective: To assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and adverse events, especially grades 3 and 4 adverse events, among patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET vs ET alone. Data Sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the main oncology conference of the European Society of Medical Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium databases for randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET vs ET for HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Searches were performed up to March 30, 2020. Study Selection: A total of 472 records were assessed in PubMed and Embase by 2 authors, including studies, international meeting reports, and reviews. Inclusion criteria were English-language phase 2 or 3 randomized clinical trials of HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer, with patients randomly assigned to receive CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET or ET alone, and having OS or PFS outcomes. The exclusion criteria were phase 1 trials, retrospective studies, or studies without survival outcomes. Excluding the references, 16 articles were relevant. After excluding studies based on exclusion criteria, 9 studies were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed potential bias. Data assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. The results were pooled using a fixed-effect model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were used to evaluate PFS, OS, and subgroup analyses. Overall response and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the objective response rate and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The primary outcome was OS. Results: In total, 9 studies that included a total of 5043 patients with metastatic breast cancer were assessed in this meta-analysis. Overall, the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET was associated with a statistically significant benefit to OS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.48; P < .001). Compared with ET alone, treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET was associated with improved OS for the following subgroups: first-line therapy (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54; P < .001), second-line therapy (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54; P < .001), premenopausal women (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66; P < .001), postmenopausal women (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.52; P < .001), visceral metastasis (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.53; P < .001), bone-only metastasis (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.88-1.68; P < .001), age younger than 65 years (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49; P < .001), and age 65 years or older (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.72; P < .001). The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET was also associated with significant PFS benefit (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.70-1.98; P < .001) and objective response rate benefit (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.61-2.53; P < .001). However, the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with ET was associated with significantly increased risk of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared with ET alone, including neutropenia (HR, 57.05; 95% CI, 38.26-85.05; P < .001), leukopenia (HR, 36.36; 95% CI, 19.35-68.34; P < .001), and diarrhea (HR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.84-8.69; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis indicated that, compared with ET alone, treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET was associated with significantly improved OS, PFS, and objective response rate among patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.