Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33048129›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2020

Association of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 Inhibitors With Survival in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jinming Li, Xingfa Huo, Fuxing Zhao, Dengfeng Ren, Raees Ahmad, Xinyue Yuan, Feng Du, Jiuda Zhao

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05181033 (A Phase II Randomized Trial of Lenvatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05181033 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Lenvatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor (ER) Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer, Who Have Progressed on First-line Aromatase Inhibitor + a CDK4/6 Inhibitor.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2021 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsBreast CancerArmsLenvatinib + Letrozole, Fulvestrant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. CCNE1 and PLK1 Mediate Resistance to Palbociclib in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinming LiBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Xingfa HuoBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Fuxing ZhaoBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Dengfeng RenBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Raees AhmadBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Xinyue YuanBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Feng DuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), The VIPII Gastrointestinal Cancer Division of the Medical Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Jiuda ZhaoBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: One of the most recent treatment regimens used for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer is treatment with the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapy (ET). Objective: To assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and adverse events, especially grades 3 and 4 adverse events, among patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET vs ET alone. Data Sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the main oncology conference of the European Society of Medical Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium databases for randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET vs ET for HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Searches were performed up to March 30, 2020. Study Selection: A total of 472 records were assessed in PubMed and Embase by 2 authors, including studies, international meeting reports, and reviews. Inclusion criteria were English-language phase 2 or 3 randomized clinical trials of HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer, with patients randomly assigned to receive CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET or ET alone, and having OS or PFS outcomes. The exclusion criteria were phase 1 trials, retrospective studies, or studies without survival outcomes. Excluding the references, 16 articles were relevant. After excluding studies based on exclusion criteria, 9 studies were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed potential bias. Data assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. The results were pooled using a fixed-effect model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were used to evaluate PFS, OS, and subgroup analyses. Overall response and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the objective response rate and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The primary outcome was OS. Results: In total, 9 studies that included a total of 5043 patients with metastatic breast cancer were assessed in this meta-analysis. Overall, the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET was associated with a statistically significant benefit to OS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.48; P < .001). Compared with ET alone, treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET was associated with improved OS for the following subgroups: first-line therapy (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54; P < .001), second-line therapy (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54; P < .001), premenopausal women (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66; P < .001), postmenopausal women (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.52; P < .001), visceral metastasis (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.53; P < .001), bone-only metastasis (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.88-1.68; P < .001), age younger than 65 years (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49; P < .001), and age 65 years or older (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.72; P < .001). The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET was also associated with significant PFS benefit (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.70-1.98; P < .001) and objective response rate benefit (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.61-2.53; P < .001). However, the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with ET was associated with significantly increased risk of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared with ET alone, including neutropenia (HR, 57.05; 95% CI, 38.26-85.05; P < .001), leukopenia (HR, 36.36; 95% CI, 19.35-68.34; P < .001), and diarrhea (HR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.84-8.69; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis indicated that, compared with ET alone, treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET was associated with significantly improved OS, PFS, and objective response rate among patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Disease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID33048129
PMCPMC8094425
OpenAlexW3091902443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.