Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33047401›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2020

Environmental and morphological constraints interact to drive the evolution of communication signals in frogs.

Matías I Muñoz, Sandra Goutte, Jacintha Ellers, Wouter Halfwerk

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Anthropogenic noise and light alter temporal but not spatial breeding behavior in a wild frog.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matías I MuñozDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9178-2233
Sandra GoutteNew York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-8939-3773
Jacintha EllersDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-1971
Wouter HalfwerkDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-0930
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals show a rich diversity of signals and displays. Among the many selective forces driving the evolution of communication signals, one widely recognized factor is the structure of the environment where animals communicate. In particular, animals communicating by sounds often emit acoustic signals from specific locations, such as high up in the air, from the ground or in the water. The properties of these different display sites may impose different constraints on sound production, and therefore drive signal evolution. Here, we used comparative phylogenetic analyses to assess the relationship between calling site (aquatic versus nonaquatic), body size and call dominant frequency of 160 frog species from the families Ranidae, Leptodactylidae and Hylidae. We found that the frequency of frogs calling from the water was lower than that of species calling outside of the water, a trend that was consistent across the three families studied. Furthermore, phylogenetic path analysis revealed that call site had both direct and indirect effects on call frequency. Indirect effects were mediated by call site influencing male body size, which in turn was negatively associated with call frequency. Our results suggest that properties of display sites can drive signal evolution, most likely not only through morphological constraints imposed on the sound production mechanism, but also through changes in body size, highlighting the relevance of the interplay between morphological adaptation and signal evolution. Changes in display site may therefore have important evolutionary consequences, as it may influence sexual selection processes and ultimately may even promote speciation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBody SizeEcosystemMaleRanidaeVocalization, Animalconstraintdisplay sitedominant frequencyfrogsignal evolutionvocal communication

Identifiers

PMID33047401
PMCPMC7756787
OpenAlexW3092205481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.