Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33047332›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2021

Effect of a labor triage checklist and ultrasound on obstetric referral at three primary health centers in Eastern Uganda.

Nicole Santos, Jude Mulowooza, Nathan Isabirye, Innocent Inhensiko, Nancy L Sloan, Sachita Shah, Elizabeth Butrick, Peter Waiswa, Dilys Walker

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicole SantosInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jude MulowoozaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nathan IsabiryeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Innocent InhensikoSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nancy L SloanInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sachita ShahDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth ButrickInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Peter WaiswaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Dilys WalkerInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USMakerere University · UGKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationEast Africa Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi-EA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test whether introduction of a midwife-performed triage checklist and focused ultrasound improves diagnosis and referral for obstetric conditions, including multiple gestation, placenta previa, oligohydramnios, preterm birth, malpresentation, and abnormal fetal heart rate.

methodsWe implemented an intake log (Phase 1), a checklist (Phase 2), and a checklist plus ultrasound scan (Phase 3) at three primary health centers in Eastern Uganda for women presenting in labor. Intake diagnoses, referral status, and delivery outcomes were assessed, as well as sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV).

resultsBetween February 2018 and July 2019, 1155, 961, and 603 women were enrolled across the three phases (n=2719); 2339 had outcome data. Incidence of any outcome-confirmed condition was 8.8%, 7.9%, and 7.1% (P=0.526) for each phase, respectively. The proportion of referred women with a condition did not change between Phases 1 and 2 (7.8% versus 8.6%, P=0.855), but increased in Phase 3 (48.4%, P<0.001). Sensitivity improved with each intervention; PPV decreased with ultrasound.

conclusionUse of ultrasound plus checklist increased referrals and sensitivity for high-risk conditions, with decreased PPV. The checklist alone improved correct diagnosis, but not referral. Further evaluation of these triage interventions to maximize diagnostic accuracy, referral decisions, and outcomes are warranted.

Indexed as

ChecklistTriageUltrasonography, PrenatalAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, ObstetricMidwiferyPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPremature BirthReferral and ConsultationUgandaYoung AdultChecklistMaternity triagePrimary health centerReferralUgandaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33047332
PMCPMC7984058
OpenAlexW3092235369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.