Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33047327›Full record

Observational studyAnaesthesia2021

Aerosolisation during tracheal intubation and extubation in an operating theatre setting.

R S Dhillon, W A Rowin, R S Humphries, K Kevin, J D Ward, T D Phan, L V Nguyen, D D Wynne, D A Scott, Clinical Aerosolisation Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R S DhillonDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-8325
W A RowinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
R S HumphriesClimate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia.
K KevinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J D WardClimate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia.
T D PhanUniversity of Melbourne and Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
L V NguyenDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
D D WynneDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
D A ScottUniversity of Melbourne and Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Clinical Aerosolisation Study Group
The University of Melbourne · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerosol-generating procedures such as tracheal intubation and extubation pose a potential risk to healthcare workers because of the possibility of airborne transmission of infection. Detailed characterisation of aerosol quantities, particle size and generating activities has been undertaken in a number of simulations but not in actual clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether the processes of facemask ventilation, tracheal intubation and extubation generate aerosols in clinical practice, and to characterise any aerosols produced. In this observational study, patients scheduled to undergo elective endonasal pituitary surgery without symptoms of COVID-19 were recruited. Airway management including tracheal intubation and extubation was performed in a standard positive pressure operating room with aerosols detected using laser-based particle image velocimetry to detect larger particles, and spectrometry with continuous air sampling to detect smaller particles. A total of 482,960 data points were assessed for complete procedures in three patients. Facemask ventilation, tracheal tube insertion and cuff inflation generated small particles 30-300 times above background noise that remained suspended in airflows and spread from the patient's facial region throughout the confines of the operating theatre. Safe clinical practice of these procedures should reflect these particle profiles. This adds to data that inform decisions regarding the appropriate precautions to take in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

AerosolsAirway ExtubationIntubation, IntratrachealOperating RoomsAirway ManagementAnesthesia, InhalationEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticle SizePersonal Protective EquipmentRespiration, ArtificialAerosolsaerosol-generating proceduresextubationintubationoccupational exposure

Identifiers

PMID33047327
PMCPMC7675280
OpenAlexW3092242736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.