ArticleProtoplasma2021
Elevated CO
Article in Protoplasma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-Translational Control of Nitrate Reductase Under Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Improving Crop Yield by Regulating Crop Growth and Nitrogen Transformation Through Water and Nitrogen Management Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation System.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The grain protein yield of barley under future drought is modified by the joint action of elevated CO2 and temperature.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Plant Nitrogen Assimilation: A Climate Change Perspective.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Plant growth and nitrate absorption and assimilation of two sweet potato cultivars with different N tolerances in response to nitrate supply.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Calcium regulates primary nitrate response associated gene transcription in a time- and dose-dependent manner.Protoplasma · 2024Article
- Differential Effect of Free-Air COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Elevated COBiology · 2022Review
- Interaction of elevated COProtoplasma · 2022Article
- Growth and Nutritional Quality of Lemnaceae Viewed Comparatively in an Ecological and Evolutionary Context.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Intersections: photosynthesis, abiotic stress, and the plant microbiome.Photosynthetica · 2022Review
- The Mechanisms Responsible for N Deficiency in Well-Watered Wheat Under Elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Nitrogen-Centric Molecular Mechanisms in Crop Plants Under Elevated COPhysiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue and canopy-level evidence suggests that elevated carbon dioxide (EC) inhibits shoot nitrate assimilation in plants and thereby affects nitrogen (N) and protein content of the economic produce. It is speculated that species or genotypes relying more on root nitrate assimilation can adapt better under EC due to the improved/steady supply of reductants required for nitrate assimilation. A study was conducted to examine the effect of EC on N assimilation and associated gene expression in wheat seedlings. Wheat genotypes, BT-Schomburgk (BTS) with comparatively high leaf nitrate reductase (NR) activity and Gluyas Early (GE) with high root NR activity were grown in hydroponic culture for 30 days with two different nitrate levels (0.05 mM and 5 mM) in the climate controlled growth chambers maintained at either ambient (400 ± 10 μmol mol
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.