ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2020
Insights in Public Health: Insurance Coverage for Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Placed in Office: A Buy and Bill Demonstration Project in Hawai'i.
Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) placement: a systematic review of the benefits and barriers in the United States.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Considerations for Healthcare Provider-Administered Lipid-Lowering Medications.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to the full range of contraceptive options for all people is critical in allowing individuals to make decisions that are consistent with their reproductive goals and values, which, in turn, enables them to achieve educational, social, and economic goals. In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act mandated that health plans must cover contraceptive supplies and services, including drugs and devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration without any out-of-pocket costs to patients. This federal mandate was similar to a law passed by the Hawai'i state legislature in 1999. Despite the Affordable Care Act, access barriers continue to prevent people from obtaining their preferred methods upon request. Same day access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) devices is a particular challenge in many clinical settings due to the high upfront cost of the device for providers. This Insights article describes the context of this issue in Hawai'i and information about a pilot test of a "buy and bill" program for LARC devices in an outpatient obstetrics and gynecology practice in Honolulu, Hawai'i. Ultimately, the majority of LARC devices were paid for fully by insurance, resulting in increased access to same day insertion with limited financial risk for the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33047106PMC7547176W3092566453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.