Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33047103›Full record

ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2020

Meeting Women's Requests for Intrauterine Device and Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation: An Exploratory Survey of Physicians.

Bliss Kaneshiro, ZoeAnn Kon, Mary Tschann, Amanda Williams, Kasey Kajiwara, Reni Soon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bliss KaneshiroDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (BK, ZK, KK, RS).
ZoeAnn KonDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (BK, ZK, KK, RS).
Mary TschannDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (BK, ZK, KK, RS).
Amanda WilliamsSchool of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (AM).
Kasey KajiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (BK, ZK, KK, RS).
Reni SoonDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (BK, ZK, KK, RS).

Funding

The Role of gp120 on Cardiovascular Disease in People Living with HIVU54MD007601 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Benjamin C. Fogelgren · 2017 to 2026
$59.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants, can support an individual in meeting their reproductive goals by allowing them to prevent pregnancy effectively. These devices can also limit an individual's control over reproduction because they generally require an in-person visit to a health care provider for removal. Returning for another visit may be logistically challenging for many individuals who may need to arrange for transportation, childcare, or take time off from work. Effectively negotiating with a provider to request removal may be additionally challenging for medically underserved and disenfranchised people who may not feel empowered to do so. The objective of this study was to assess providers' willingness to honor patients' requests for IUD and contraceptive implant removal on the day of the request. A survey was conducted in which clinicians were presented with scenarios of women requesting IUD or implant removal. Clinicians were asked what they were most likely to do. A total of 105 clinicians were surveyed. The responses of 60 clinicians who inserted IUDs and 57 who provided the contraceptive implant were included in the analysis. When asked about same-day removal of an IUD or implant from a dissatisfied patient who requested removal, 40% stated they would remove the implant, and 57% stated they would remove the IUD on the day of the request. Findings from this study suggest many clinicians would be unwilling or unable to accommodate a patient's request for device removal at the time of their visit. This delay or refusal represents a significant barrier for patients and has implications for reproductive autonomy that should be further explored.

Indexed as

Intrauterine DevicesPhysiciansContraceptive AgentsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesContraceptive Agentscontraceptive coerciondiscontinuationimplantintrauterine devicereproductive justice

Identifiers

PMID33047103
PMCPMC7547180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.