Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046835›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2021

The relationship between BRCA-associated breast cancer and age factors: an analysis of the Japanese HBOC consortium database.

Maiko Okano, Tadashi Nomizu, Kazunoshin Tachibana, Miki Nagatsuka, Masami Matsuzaki, Naoto Katagata, Toru Ohtake, Shiro Yokoyama, Masami Arai, Seigo Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical and Pathological Characteristics and Treatment Implications ofBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk-reducing decisions regarding germlineJournal of medical genetics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Differences in age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer for eachJournal of gynecologic oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maiko OkanoDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan. omaiko@hoshipital.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-8494
Tadashi NomizuDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Kazunoshin TachibanaDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Miki NagatsukaDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Masami MatsuzakiDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Naoto KatagataDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Toru OhtakeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Shiro YokoyamaBreast Center, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masami AraiDiagnostics and Therapeutics of Intractable Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Seigo NakamuraBreast Center, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant prevalence in Japanese breast cancer is unclear. Here, we analyzed BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant prevalence with a particular focus on age factors, using the Japanese HBOC consortium database. All registered subjects were Japanese individuals who underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing from January 1996 to July 2017 according to the Japanese HBOC consortium database. Cases were extracted and analyzed for each evaluation item. Overall BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant prevalence was 11.2% and 9.0% in the cohort of 2366 proband patients, respectively. The age at onset of breast cancer for patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants was significantly lower than that for patients without a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. In both BRCA1/2 patients, ages at onset were not statistically significantly different between two subtype groups (ER-positive vs. TNBC). We analyzed the BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant prevalence among age groups in patients with no family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the TNBC group, the rate of genetic variants was more frequent among younger patients. Our results demonstrated that early breast cancer onset is associated with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant in the Japanese population. Younger TNBC patients were more likely to have a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant irrespective of a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Asian PeopleBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogensFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHumansJapanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogensProgesteroneReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID33046835
PMCPMC7843417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.