ArticleScientific reports2020
Myocardial contraction fraction predicts mortality for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Genotype Positivity in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Machine Learning.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2021Trial
- Reappraising cardiac function with myocardial contraction fraction: normal values, disease detection, and prognostication.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of albumin to fibrinogen ratio for mortality in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Comparison of Nonclassic and Classic Phenotype of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Focused on Prognostic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parameters: A Single-Center Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance mechanical parameters for myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Application of the ALBI Scoring System for Mortality Outcome Prediction in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Global heart · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The myocardial contraction fraction (MCF: stroke volume to myocardial volume) is a novel volumetric measure of left ventricular myocardial shortening. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether MCF could predict adverse outcomes for HCM patients. A retrospective cohort study of 438 HCM patients was conducted. The primary and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and HCM-related mortality. The association between MCF and endpoints was analysed. During a follow-up period of 1738.2 person-year, 76 patients (17.2%) reached primary endpoint and 50 patients (65.8%) reached secondary endpoint. Both all-cause mortality rate and HCM-related mortality rate decreased across MCF tertiles (24.7% vs. 17.9% vs. 9.5%, P trend = 0.003 for all-cause mortality; 16.4% vs. 9.7% vs. 6.1%, P trend = 0.021 for HCM-related mortality). Patients in the third tertile had a significantly lower risk of developing adverse outcomes than patients in the first tertile: all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12-0.56, P = 0.001), HCM-related mortality (adjusted HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.42, P < 0.001). At 1-, 3-, and 5-year of follow-up, areas under curve were 0.699, 0.643, 0.618 for all-cause mortality and 0.749, 0.661, 0.613 for HCM-related mortality (all P value < 0.001), respectively. In HCM patients, MCF could independently predict all-cause mortality and HCM-related mortality, which should be considered for overall risk assessment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.