Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046721›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities.

Tahira Batool, Shafaqat Ali, Mahmoud F Seleiman, Naima Huma Naveed, Aamir Ali, Khurshid Ahmed, Muhammad Abid, Muhammad Rizwan, Muhammad Rizwan Shahid, Majed Alotaibi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
43.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  17. Enhanced chickpea (Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Tahira BatoolDepartment of Botanical Sciences, University of Sargodha, Punjab, 40210, Pakistan.
Shafaqat AliDepartment of Environment Sciences and Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. shafaqataligill@yahoo.com.
Mahmoud F SeleimanPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4779-9414
Naima Huma NaveedDepartment of Botanical Sciences, University of Sargodha, Punjab, 40210, Pakistan.
Aamir AliDepartment of Botanical Sciences, University of Sargodha, Punjab, 40210, Pakistan.
Khurshid AhmedKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Production Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad AbidKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Production Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Environment Sciences and Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3513-2041
Muhammad Rizwan ShahidInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Majed AlotaibiPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Al-AshkarPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-1555
Muhammad MubusharPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAUniversity of Sargodha · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKNanjing Agricultural University · CNAl-Azhar University · EGUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of plant physiological functions under drought stress is normally considered a positive feature as it indicates sustained plant health and growth. This study was conducted to investigate whether plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Bacillus subtilis HAS31 has potential to maintain potato growth and yield under drought stress. We analyzed trends of chlorophyll concentration, photosynthesis process, relative water content, osmolytes, antioxidants enzymes and oxidative stress, relative growth rate, tuber and aboveground biomass production in two potato varieties, Santae (drought-tolerant) and PRI-Red (drought-sensitive). Plants of both genotypes were treated with 100 g of HAS31 inoculant at 10 days after germination and exposed to different soil relative water contents (SRWC), including 80 ± 5% (well watered), 60 ± 5% (moderate stress) and 40 ± 5% SRWC (severe stress) for 7 days at tuber initiation stage (30 days after germination). The drought stress reduced plant relative growth rate, biomass production, leaf area, number of leaves and tubers, tuber weight, and final yield. The drought-stressed plants showed decline in chlorophyll contents, membrane stability, leaf relative water contents and photosynthetic rate. Under drought stress, enzymatic activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), contents of total soluble sugars, soluble proteins and proline increased. The application of PGPR reduced the impact of drought and maintained higher growth and physio-chemical traits of the plants. The plants with PGPR application showed higher relative growth rate, dry matter production, leaf area, number of tubers, tuber weight and yield as compared to plants without PGPR. The PGPR-HAS31 treated plants maintained higher photosynthetic process, contents of chlorophyll, soluble proteins, total soluble sugars, and enzymatic activities of CAT, POD and SOD as compared to plants without PGPR. The results of the study suggest that plant growth regulators have ability to sustain growth and yield of potato under drought stress by maintaining physiological functions of the plants.

Indexed as

DroughtsOxidative StressAntioxidantsBacillus subtilisCarbohydrate MetabolismCarbohydratesCaseinsCatalaseChlorophyllLipidsPeroxidasePhotosynthesisPlant ProteinsPlant Proteins, DietarySolanum tuberosumSuperoxide DismutaseAntioxidantsCarbohydratesCaseinsCatalaseChlorophyllLipidsOsmolitePeroxidasePlant ProteinsPlant Proteins, DietarySuperoxide DismutaseWater

Identifiers

PMID33046721
PMCPMC7550571
OpenAlexW3092406175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.