ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A Review of Antibacterial Candidates with New Modes of Action.ACS infectious diseases · 2024Review
- The evolution of antimicrobial peptide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is severely constrained by random peptide mixtures.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Improving phage therapy by evasion of phage resistance mechanisms.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Review
- Assessing the predictability of fungicide resistance evolution through in vitro selection.Journal of plant diseases and protection : scientific journal of the German Phytomedical Society (DPG) · 2024Article
- Isobactins:Chemical science · 2022Article
- Article
- Visualizing the mode of action and supramolecular assembly of teixobactin analogues inChemical science · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial pathogens are rapidly evolving resistance to all clinically available antibiotics. One part of the solution to this complex issue is to better understand the resistance mechanisms to new and existing antibiotics. Here, we focus on two antibiotics. Teixobactin is a recently discovered promising antibiotic that is claimed to "kill pathogens without detectable resistance" (L. L. Ling, T. Schneider, A. J. Peoples, A. L. Spoering, et al., Nature 517:455-459, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14098). Moenomycin A has been extensively used in animal husbandry for over 50 years with no meaningful antibiotic resistance arising. However, the nature, mechanisms, and consequences of the evolution of resistance to these "resistance-proof" compounds have not been investigated. Through a fusion of experimental evolution, whole-genome sequencing, and structural biology, we show that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.