Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046478›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Protocol of a randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of medication optimisation in elderly inpatients: medication optimisation protocol efficacy for geriatric inpatients (MPEG) trial.

Kenya Ie, Masanori Hirose, Tsubasa Sakai, Iori Motohashi, Mari Aihara, Takuya Otsuki, Ayako Tsuboya, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hikari Hashi, Eisuke Inoue and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kenya IeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan kenya.ie@marianna-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-1387-0588
Masanori HiroseDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tsubasa SakaiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Iori MotohashiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mari AiharaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takuya OtsukiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ayako TsuboyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsumotoDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hikari HashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Eisuke InoueShowa University Research Administration Center, Showa University, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki TakahashiDivision of Medical Informatics, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Eiko KomiyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuka ItohDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoya TsuchidaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8517-3941
Eri KurosuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Steven M AlbertDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chiaki OkuseDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahide MatsudaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
St. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPKawasaki Municipal Hospital · JPShowa University · JPUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhether medication optimisation improves clinical outcomes in elderly individuals remains unclear. The current study aims to evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary team-based medication optimisation on survival, rehospitalisation and unscheduled hospital visits in elderly patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report the protocol of a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The enrolled subjects will be medical inpatients, aged 65 years or older, admitted to a community hospital and receiving five or more regular medications. The participants will be randomly assigned to receive either an intervention for medication optimisation or the usual care. The intervention will consist of a multidisciplinary team-based medication review, followed by a medication optimisation proposal based on the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment criteria and an implicit medication optimisation protocol. Medication optimisation summaries will be sent to primary care physicians and community pharmacists on discharge. The primary outcome will be a composite of death, unscheduled hospital visits and rehospitalisation until 48 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include each of the primary endpoints, the number of prescribed medications, quality of life score, level of long-term care required, drug-related adverse events, death during hospitalisation and falls. Participants will be followed up for 48 weeks with bimonthly telephone interviews to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. A log-rank test stratified by randomisation factors will be used to compare the incidence of the composite endpoint. The study was initiated in 2019 and a minimum of 500 patients will be enrolled. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of St. Marianna University School of Medicine (No. 4129). The results of the current study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000035265.

Indexed as

GeriatricsMedication Therapy ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingInpatientsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicclinical pharmacologygeriatric medicineinternal medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33046478
PMCPMC7552871
OpenAlexW3092388542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.