Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046094›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2020

A pilot cluster randomised trial of the medicines and alcohol consultation (MAC): an intervention to discuss alcohol use in community pharmacy medicine review services.

Duncan Stewart, Anne van Dongen, Michelle Watson, Laura Mandefield, Karl Atkin, Ranjita Dhital, Brent Foster, Brendan Gough, Catherine Hewitt, Mary Madden and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Duncan StewartDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. d.stewart@londonmet.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7355-4280
Anne van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Michelle WatsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Laura MandefieldDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Karl AtkinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Ranjita DhitalDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Brent FosterWhitworths Chemists Ltd, Scunthorpe, UK.
Brendan GoughSchool of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Catherine HewittDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Mary MaddenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Stephanie MorrisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Ronan O'CarrollDepartment of Psychology, Stirling University, Stirling, UK.
Margaret OgdenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Steve ParrottDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Judith WatsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Sue WhiteNorth of England Commissioning Support (NECS), Newcastle, UK.
Cate WhittleseaUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Jim McCambridgeDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
University of York · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBNorth Staffordshire Clinical Commissioning Group · GBScunthorpe General Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Reading · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0216-20002National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0216-20002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol interventions are important to the developing public health role of community pharmacies. The Medicines and Alcohol Consultation (MAC) is a new intervention, co-produced with community pharmacists (CPs) and patients, which involves a CP practice development programme designed to integrate discussion of alcohol within existing NHS medicine review services. We conducted a pilot trial of the MAC and its delivery to investigate all study procedures to inform progression to a definitive trial.

methodsThis cluster pilot RCT was conducted in 10 community pharmacies in Yorkshire, UK, with a CP from each who regularly conducted Medicine Use Review (MUR) and New Medicine Service (NMS) consultations. Randomisation was conducted using a secure remote randomisation service. Intervention CPs (n = 5) were trained to deliver the MAC in MUR/NMS consultations. Control CPs (n = 5) provided these services as usual. Consecutive MUR/NMS patients were asked by CPs to participate, screened for eligibility (consumption of alcohol at least twice per week), and baseline data collected for those eligible. A two-month follow-up telephone interview was conducted. Blinding of CPs was not possible, but patients were blinded to the alcohol focus of the trial. Primary outcomes were total weekly UK units (8 g of ethanol per unit) of alcohol consumption in the week prior to follow-up, and confidence in medications management. Trial procedures were assessed by recruitment, attrition, and follow-up rates.

results260 patients were approached by CPs to take part in the trial, 68% (n = 178) were assessed for eligibility and 30% (n = 54) of these patients were eligible. Almost all eligible patients (n = 51; 94%) consented to participate, of whom 92% (n = 47) were followed-up at 2 months; alcohol consumption was lower in the intervention arm and confidence in medication management reduced slightly for both groups. Exploration of recall issues at follow-up showed a high level of agreement between a two-item quantity/frequency measure and 7-day guided recall of alcohol consumption.

conclusionsThe pilot trial demonstrates the feasibility of implementing the MAC in community pharmacy and trial recruitment and data collection procedures. However, decommissioning of MURs means that it is not possible to conduct a definitive trial of the intervention in this service.

trial registrationISRCTN57447996.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingCommunity Pharmacy ServicesDrug Utilization ReviewFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationUnited KingdomAlcoholCommunity pharmacyFeasibilityMedicine reviewsPilot trial

Identifiers

PMID33046094
PMCPMC7552554
OpenAlexW3092607936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.