Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046071›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study.

Anqi Chen, Scott Fielding, X Joan Hu, Patrick McLane, Andrew McRae, Maria Ospina, Rhonda J Rosychuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acuity of asthma exacerbations in Alberta, Canada is increasing: a population-based study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anqi ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 3-524 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Scott FieldingEmergency Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3E4, Canada.
X Joan HuDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Patrick McLaneEmergency Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3E4, Canada.
Andrew McRaeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Maria OspinaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2, Canada.
Rhonda J RosychukDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 3-524 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada. rhonda.rosychuk@ualberta.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8019-5466
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR #394223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper describes and compares patient flow characteristics of adult high system users (HSUs) and control groups in Alberta and Ontario emergency departments (EDs), Canada.

methodsAnnual cohorts of HSUs were created by identifying patients who made up the top 10% of ED users (by count of ED presentations) in the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System during 2011-2016. Random samples of patients not in the HSU groups were selected as controls. Presentation (e.g., acuity) and ED times (e.g., time to physician initial assessment [PIA], length of stay) data were extracted and described. The length of stay for 2015/2016 data was decomposed into stages and Cox models compared time between stages.

resultsThere were 20,343,230 and 18,222,969 ED presentations made by 7,032,655 and 1,923,462 individuals in the control and HSU groups, respectively. The Ontario groups had higher acuity than the Alberta groups: about 20% in the Ontario groups were from the emergent level whereas Alberta had 11-15%. Time to PIA was similar across provinces and groups (medians of 60 min to 67 min). Lengths of stay were longest for Ontario HSUs (median = 3 h) and shortest for Alberta HSUs (median = 2.2 h). HSUs had shorter times to PIA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02,1.03), longer times from PIA to decision (HR = 0.84; 95%CI 0.84,0.84), and longer times from decision to leaving the ED (HR = 0.91; 95%CI 0.91,0.91).

conclusionsOntario HSUs had higher acuity and longer ED lengths of stay than the other groups. In both provinces, HSU had shorter times to PIA and longer times after assessment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlbertaCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesTime-to-TreatmentEmergency departmentFrequent health service usersPatient flow

Identifiers

PMID33046071
PMCPMC7552544
OpenAlexW3092218287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.