Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046065›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Implementing social accountability for contraceptive services: lessons from Uganda.

Victoria Boydell, Nanono Nulu, Karen Hardee, Jill Gay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria BoydellGlobal Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Chemin Rigot 2, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland. vickyboydell@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5051-9167
Nanono NuluDepartment of Population Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Karen HardeeWhat Works Association, Washington, DC, USA.
Jill GayMIA, What Works Association, Washington, DC, USA.
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies · CHMakerere University · UG

Funding

USAID AID-OAA-A-13-00087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing evidence shows that social accountability contributes to improving health care services, with much promise for addressing women's barriers in contraceptive care. Yet little is known about how social accountability works in the often-complex context of sexual and reproductive health, particularly as sex and reproduction can be sensitive topics in the open and public formats typical of social accountability. This paper explores how social accountability operates in the highly gendered and complex context of contraceptive care.

methodsThis exploratory research uses a case study approach to provide a more grounded understanding of how social accountability processes operate in the context of contraceptive information and services. We observed two social accountability projects that predominantly focused on contraceptive care in Uganda over a year. Five instruments were used to capture information from different source materials and multiple respondents. In total, one hundred and twenty-eight interviews were conducted and over 1000 pages of project documents were collected. Data were analyzed and compiled into four case studies that provide a thick description of how these two projects operated.

resultsThe case studies show the critical role of information, dialogue and negotiation in social accountability in the context of contraceptive care. Improved community and health system relationships, community empowerment, provider and health system responsiveness and enhanced availability and access to services were reported in both projects. There were also changes in how different actors related to themselves and to each other, and contraceptive care, a previously taboo topic, became a legitimate area for public dialogue.

conclusionThe study found that while social accountability in the context of contraceptive services is indeed sensitive, it can be a powerful tool to dissolving resistance to family planning and facilitating a more productive discourse on the topic.

Indexed as

Social ResponsibilityAdolescentContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePregnancyQualitative ResearchSex EducationUgandaYoung AdultContraceptive AgentsCase studiesContraceptionGenderSocial accountabilityUganda

Identifiers

PMID33046065
PMCPMC7549211
OpenAlexW3092406777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.