Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33046050›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Perspectives on the psychological and emotional burden of having gestational diabetes amongst low-income women in Cape Town, South Africa.

Lorrein Shamiso Muhwava, Katherine Murphy, Christina Zarowsky, Naomi Levitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pregnancy as an opportunity to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus: FIGO Best Practice Advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorrein Shamiso MuhwavaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. lorrein.muhwava@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8585-0693
Katherine MurphyDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Christina ZarowskyChronic Diseases Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Cape Town, South Africa.
Naomi LevittDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

International Development Research Centre [108002-001]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may affect women's mental wellbeing, functioning and quality of life, with potentially negative effects on treatment adherence. Identifying and addressing the psychological and emotional needs of women with GDM, could have benefits for sustainable long-term behavioural change following the affected pregnancy. This study explored the lived experiences of women with GDM and the impact of GDM on their experience of pregnancy and sense of well-being.

methodsPurposive sampling was used to recruit women who had been diagnosed with GDM in their previous pregnancy and received antenatal care at a tertiary hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. This was a descriptive qualitative study using a combination of focus groups and in-depth interviews for an in- depth exploration of women's lived experiences of GDM, their context and perceived needs. Data analysis followed an iterative thematic analysis approach.

resultsThirty-five women participated in nine focus groups and five in-depth interviews. Women discussed the emotional and psychological burden of having GDM, highlighting (i) their initial emotional reactions to receiving a GDM diagnosis, (ii) their experience of adjusting to the constraints of living with GDM (iii) their feelings of apprehension about childbirth and their maternal role and (iv) their feelings of abandonment in the post-partum period once the intensive support from both health system and family ends.

conclusionsThe current biomedical model used in the management of GDM, is highly foetal-centric and fails to acknowledge important psychological factors that contribute to women's overall wellbeing and experience of pregnancy. These results demonstrate the importance of incorporating mental health support in the management and care for women with GDM in public health services, along with facilitating emotional support from partners and family members. Based on our findings, we recommend routine mental health and psychosocial vulnerability screening and monitoring for women diagnosed with GDM throughout pregnancy and postpartum to improve prognoses.

Indexed as

EmotionsAdultDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIncomeInterviews as TopicMental HealthPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSouth AfricaGestational diabetes mellitusLow-incomeMental healthPregnancySouth AfricaType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33046050
PMCPMC7552378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.