Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33045942›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2021

The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future.

Allison M Greaney, Laura E Niklason

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Role of Collagen in Airway Mechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison M GreaneyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Laura E NiklasonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

Engineered Tracheal ReplacementsR01HL138540 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NIKLASON, LAURA E · 2017 to 2020
$2.5M
Engineered Airway Construct for Cystic Fibrosis Disease ModelingR21EB024889 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NIKLASON, LAURA E · 2018 to 2019
$445k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL138540NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft. Impact statement The field of tracheal engineering has floundered in recent years due to multiple article retractions. However, with recent advances in biofabrication and tissue analysis techniques, the field remains ripe for advancement through collaboration between engineers and clinicians. With a long history of clinical application of tracheal replacements, engineered tracheas are arguably the regenerative technology with the greatest potential for translation. This work describes the many phases of engineered tracheal replacements that have been applied in human patients over the past 100 years with the goal of carrying forward critical lessons into development of the next generation of engineered tracheal graft.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTracheaHumansTissue Scaffoldsclinical outcomeshistoryscaffold designtracheal engineering

Identifiers

PMID33045942
PMCPMC8390779
OpenAlexW3092346478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.