ArticleAmerican journal of men's health
Addressing Health-Care System Inequities in the Management of Erectile Dysfunction: A Call to Action.
Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Restoring sexual health and relationship quality through penile prosthesis implantation.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Cost Considerations in Penile Implant Surgery from a Global Perspective.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Actionable partnerships for shaping healthcare's future by closing the equitable access gap and delivering meaningful change.Journal of public health policy · 2025Review
- Patient out-of-pocket costs for guideline-recommended treatments for erectile dysfunction: a medicare cost modeling analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Racial and socioeconomic disparities in surgical care for post-prostate cancer treatment complications: A nationwide Medicare-based analysis.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Access to inflatable penile prosthesis surgery as indicated by distances traveled among US men with Medicare.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Implantable Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Dysfunction: Insurance Coverage in the United States.Urology practice · 2023Article
- The Epidemic of COVID-19-Related Erectile Dysfunction: A Scoping Review and Health Care Perspective.Sexual medicine reviews · 2022Article
- Sexual Dysfunction and Gun Ownership in America: When Hard Data Meet a Limp Theory.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common, burdensome, and costly urologic condition strongly related to all aspects of general health, from physical to mental. ED has profound consequences as it may interfere physical well-being, quality of life (QoL), self-esteem, relationships, self-worth, and productivity. It is therefore important to ensure that all types of effective ED treatments are consistently accessible to patients. While federal and state mandates ensure access to treatment for women's breast health, female-factor infertility, and gender affirmation to ensure that these individuals do not experience a diminished QoL, there are no comparable mandates for men's sexual and reproductive health. The burden of ED necessitates a call to action to improve the accessibility of ED treatments. The call to action steps include: (a) coverage for pharmacological, surgical, and other ED treatments should be viewed in the same way as coverage for other health issues, whether male or female and regardless of the stages of treatment, physical dysfunction, or physical changes; (b) American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines for the management of ED should be followed, including implementation of templates in electronic medical records (EMRs) to support adherence to the guidelines; and (c) coverage criteria should explicitly state that the criteria are intended to support gender equity for sexual and reproductive health care and should not be used to prevent men from receiving medically necessary ED treatments. This call to action offers a pathway to support every man who seeks treatment for ED as a medically necessary intervention by removing systemic health-care barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.