Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33045918›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

Addressing Health-Care System Inequities in the Management of Erectile Dysfunction: A Call to Action.

Arthur L Burnett, Natalie C Edwards, Tonya M Barrett, Krista D Nitschelm, Samir K Bhattacharyya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur L BurnettDepartment of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Natalie C EdwardsHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Health Services Consulting Corporation, Boxborough, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-1467
Tonya M BarrettGlobal Health Economics & Market Access, Women's Health & Prosthetic Urology-Men's Health, Boston Scientific Corporation, Urology Pelvic Health Division, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Krista D NitschelmGlobal Health Economics & Market Access, Women's Health & Prosthetic Urology-Men's Health, Boston Scientific Corporation, Urology Pelvic Health Division, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Samir K BhattacharyyaHealth Economics and Market Access, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Boston Scientific (United States) · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common, burdensome, and costly urologic condition strongly related to all aspects of general health, from physical to mental. ED has profound consequences as it may interfere physical well-being, quality of life (QoL), self-esteem, relationships, self-worth, and productivity. It is therefore important to ensure that all types of effective ED treatments are consistently accessible to patients. While federal and state mandates ensure access to treatment for women's breast health, female-factor infertility, and gender affirmation to ensure that these individuals do not experience a diminished QoL, there are no comparable mandates for men's sexual and reproductive health. The burden of ED necessitates a call to action to improve the accessibility of ED treatments. The call to action steps include: (a) coverage for pharmacological, surgical, and other ED treatments should be viewed in the same way as coverage for other health issues, whether male or female and regardless of the stages of treatment, physical dysfunction, or physical changes; (b) American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines for the management of ED should be followed, including implementation of templates in electronic medical records (EMRs) to support adherence to the guidelines; and (c) coverage criteria should explicitly state that the criteria are intended to support gender equity for sexual and reproductive health care and should not be used to prevent men from receiving medically necessary ED treatments. This call to action offers a pathway to support every man who seeks treatment for ED as a medically necessary intervention by removing systemic health-care barriers.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesQuality ImprovementErectile DysfunctionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMen's HealthQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSexual BehaviorSurveys and Questionnairesaccess to careerectile dysfunctiongender equityhealth-care issuesmedically necessarypolicysexuality

Identifiers

PMID33045918
PMCPMC7557698
OpenAlexW3092275349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.