Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33045898›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2020

Continuous improvement on the rationality of prophylactic injectable PPIs usage by a clinical pharmacist-led guidance team at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital.

Yun Hong, Ziqi Ye, Zhe Gao, Yuefeng Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yun HongThe First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ziqi YeThe First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhe GaoThe First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yuefeng RaoThe First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-2768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effects of a clinical pharmacist-led-guidance-team (CPGT) on improving rational prophylactic injectable proton pump inhibitor use (PIPU) and to explore the application of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) method in promoting rational PIPU.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study among 814 patients at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. We enrolled 98 patients before the PDCA; 297 and 419 patients were included in first- and second-round PDCA cycles, respectively. The CPGT established the criteria for PIPU and conducted interventions, including medical record reviews, provision of feedback, clinician education, and outcome analysis. We analyzed the appropriateness and costs of PIPU before and after establishment of the PDCA cycle.

resultsImplementation of continuous CPGT-led intervention and a PDCA cycle significantly decreased the rate of irrational PIPU (53.06% vs. 8.57%), including duration, administration route, indication, and dosing frequency. Costs of total (USD 211.28 ± 162.33 vs. 53.17 ± 22.32) and inappropriate (USD 76.70 ± 59.78 vs. 2.25 ± 3.86) PIPU per patient were significantly reduced. The target compliance rate was 107.56%.

conclusionA CPGT can have an effective role in improving rational PIPU and optimizing administration through a PDCA cycle, to attain improved clinical and economic outcomes.

Indexed as

PharmacistsProton Pump InhibitorsChinaHospitals, TeachingHumansRetrospective StudiesProton Pump Inhibitorsclinical pharmacistinterventionPlan–Do–Check–Actprescription evaluationProphylactic injectable proton pump inhibitor userational drug use

Identifiers

PMID33045898
PMCPMC7557690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.