ArticlePloS one2020
How to support a co-creative research approach in order to foster impact. The development of a Co-creation Impact Compass for healthcare researchers.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring co-design: a systematic review of concepts, processes, models, and frameworks used in public health research.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Development of an interprofessional person-centred care concept for persons with care needs living in their own homes in Germany (interprof HOME): a mixed methods study.BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- The We Can Quit2 Smoking Cessation Trial: Knowledge Exchange and Dissemination Following a Community-Based Participatory Research Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- PRODUCES+: Guidance for co-creation in public health informed by evidence and user experience.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Gamified Assessment of Cognitive Impulsivity in Eating Disorders and Mental Ill-Health: Mixed Methods Study Incorporating Lived Experience Co-Design and Evaluation.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Co-creating a decision-making framework for primary healthcare models in conflict-affected Cameroon and Nigeria.BMJ global health · 2026Observational
- Co-creation of community-based innovations to improve access to malaria treatment in conflict-affected regions of Cameroon.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Tailoring a national smoking cessation support programme in co-creation with (expectant) parents in vulnerable situations.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Development of BreeZe: a self-management support intervention for burn survivors informed by evidence, theory, and stakeholder co-creation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Ethical challenges, responses and reasoning in co-creation for health promotion: a scoping review.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Development of a Web-Based Intervention to Support Primary Health Care Professionals in Digital Health Measurement: User-Centered Participatory Approach.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Costs in value-based health care dashboards: a qualitative study on stakeholder requirements.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- School staff experiences on involvement in a co-creation process: a Health CASCADE scoping review and thematic synthesis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study.Health research policy and systems · 2024Review
- Wearable neurofeedback acceptance model for students' stress and anxiety management in academic settings.PloS one · 2024Article
- Exploring stakeholders' experiences in co-creation initiatives for clinical nursing education: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.One health outlook · 2023Article
- Cocreation of Assistive Technologies for Patients With Long COVID: Qualitative Analysis of a Literature Review on the Challenges of Patient Involvement in Health and Nursing Sciences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active participation of stakeholders in health research practice is important to generate societal impact of outcomes, as innovations will more likely be implemented and disseminated in clinical practice. To foster a co-creative process, numerous frameworks and tools are available. As they originate from different professions, it is not evident that health researchers are aware of these tools, or able to select and use them in a meaningful way. This article describes the bottom-up development process of a compass and presents the final outcome. This Co-creation Impact Compass combines a well-known business model with tools from design thinking that promote active participation by all relevant stakeholders. It aims to support healthcare researchers to select helpful and valid co-creation tools for the right purpose and at the right moment. Using the Co-creation Impact Compass might increase the researchers' understanding of the value of co-creation, and it provides help to engage stakeholders in all phases of a research project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.