ArticlePloS one2020
Using fluorescence flow cytometry data for single-cell gene expression analysis in bacteria.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell detection and quantification of the microbiota by MicFLY.Cell host & microbe · 2026Article
- A multilevel hierarchical framework for quantification of experimental heterogeneity in population snapshot data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Single-cell quantification of the microbiota by flow cytometry: MicFLY.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A population model reveals a surprising role of stochastic cell division in epigenetic memory systems.iScience · 2025Article
- Stress-Induced Constraint on Expression Noise of Essential Genes in E. coli.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Dielectrophoretic capture and electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of single melanoma cells at an array of interlocked spiral bipolar electrodes.ChemElectroChem · 2024Article
- Quantum measurement enables single biomarker sensitivity in flow cytometry.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Construction and Characterization of Light-Responsive Transcriptional Systems.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Multidimensional characterization of inducible promoters and a highly light-sensitive LOV-transcription factor.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Identifying Bacterial Lineages in Salmonella by Flow Cytometry.EcoSal Plus · 2022Review
- Identifying cell-to-cell variability in internalization using flow cytometry.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Genome-wide gene expression noise in Escherichia coli is condition-dependent and determined by propagation of noise through the regulatory network.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Rapid high-resolution detection of colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria using flow cytometry: a comparison with broth microdilution, a commercial screening test and WGS.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence flow cytometry is increasingly being used to quantify single-cell expression distributions in bacteria in high-throughput. However, there has been no systematic investigation into the best practices for quantitative analysis of such data, what systematic biases exist, and what accuracy and sensitivity can be obtained. We investigate these issues by measuring the same E. coli strains carrying fluorescent reporters using both flow cytometry and microscopic setups and systematically comparing the resulting single-cell expression distributions. Using these results, we develop methods for rigorous quantitative inference of single-cell expression distributions from fluorescence flow cytometry data. First, we present a Bayesian mixture model to separate debris from viable cells using all scattering signals. Second, we show that cytometry measurements of fluorescence are substantially affected by autofluorescence and shot noise, which can be mistaken for intrinsic noise in gene expression, and present methods to correct for these using calibration measurements. Finally, we show that because forward- and side-scatter signals scale non-linearly with cell size, and are also affected by a substantial shot noise component that cannot be easily calibrated unless independent measurements of cell size are available, it is not possible to accurately estimate the variability in the sizes of individual cells using flow cytometry measurements alone. To aid other researchers with quantitative analysis of flow cytometry expression data in bacteria, we distribute E-Flow, an open-source R package that implements our methods for filtering debris and for estimating true biological expression means and variances from the fluorescence signal. The package is available at https://github.com/vanNimwegenLab/E-Flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.