Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33045009›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices.

Allen Nsangi, Andrew David Oxman, Matt Oxman, Sarah E Rosenbaum, Daniel Semakula, Ronald Ssenyonga, Michael Mugisha, Faith Chelagat, Margaret Kaseje, Leaticia Nyirazinyoye and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Allen NsangiCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew David OxmanCentre for Informed Health Choices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Matt OxmanCentre for Informed Health Choices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Sarah E RosenbaumCentre for Informed Health Choices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Daniel SemakulaCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ronald SsenyongaCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael MugishaFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Faith ChelagatFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Margaret KasejeTropical Institute of Community Health and Development (TICH), Kisumu, Kenya.
Leaticia NyirazinyoyeUniversity of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Iain ChalmersCentre for Informed Health Choices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Nelson Kaulukusi SewankamboCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs part of a five year plan (2019-2023), the Informed Health Choices Project, is developing and evaluating resources for helping secondary school students learn to think critically about health claims and choices. We will bring together key stakeholders; such as secondary school teachers and students, our main target for the IHC secondary school resources, school administrators, policy makers, curriculum development specialists and parents, to enable us gain insight about the context.

objectivesTo ensure that stakeholders are effectively and appropriately engaged in the design, evaluation and dissemination of the learning resources.To evaluate the extent to which stakeholders were successfully engaged.

methodsUsing a multi-stage stratified sampling method, we will identify a representative sample of secondary schools with varied characteristics that might modify the effects of the learning resources such as, the school location (rural, semi-urban or urban), ownership (private, public) and ICT facilities (under resourced, highly resourced). A sample of schools will be randomly selected from the schools in each stratum. We will aim to recruit a diverse sample of students and secondary school teachers from those schools. Other stakeholders will be purposively selected to ensure a diverse range of experience and expertise.

resultsTogether with the teacher and student networks and the advisory panels, we will establish measurable success criteria that reflect the objectives of engaging stakeholders at the start of the project and evaluate the extent to which those criteria were met at the end of the project.

conclusionWe aim for an increase in research uptake, improve quality and appropriateness of research results, accountability and social justice.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHumansResearch DesignSchoolsSchool TeachersStakeholder ParticipationStudents

Identifiers

PMID33045009
PMCPMC7549807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.