ArticlePloS one2020
The impact of in vitro cultivation on the natural life cycle of the tick-borne relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia turicatae.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Immunological Responses toMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tick-borne relapsing fever is an infectious disease caused by Borrelia species and are primarily transmitted by Ornithodoros ticks. Prior work indicated that in vitro cultivated spirochetes remain infectious to mice by needle inoculation; however, the impact of laboratory propagation on the pathogens natural life cycle has not been determined. Our current study assessed the effect of serial cultivation on the natural tick-mammalian transmission cycle. First, we evaluated genomic DNA profiles from B. turicatae grown to 30, 60, 120, and 300 generations, and these spirochetes were used to needle inoculate mice. Uninfected nymphal ticks were fed on these mice and acquisition, transstadial maintenance, and subsequent transmission after tick bite was determined. Infection frequencies in mice that were fed upon by ticks colonized with B. turicatae grown to 30, 60, and 120 generations were 100%, 100%, and 30%, respectively. Successful infection of mice by tick feeding was not detected after 120 generations. Quantifying B. turicatae in tick tissues indicated that by 300 generations they no longer colonized the vector. The results indicate that in vitro cultivation significantly affects the establishment of tick colonization and murine infection. This work provides a foundation for the identification of essential genetic elements in the tick-mammalian infectious cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.