Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33044911›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2020

The SWI/SNF ATPase BRG1 stimulates DNA end resection and homologous recombination by reducing nucleosome density at DNA double strand breaks and by promoting the recruitment of the CtIP nuclease.

Emily Hays, Elizabeth Nettleton, Caitlin Carter, Mariangel Morales, Lynn Vo, Max Passo, Renier Vélez-Cruz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Esophageal carcinoma withTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily HaysDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Elizabeth NettletonChicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Caitlin CarterChicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Mariangel MoralesCollege of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Lynn VoChicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Max PassoCollege of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Renier Vélez-CruzDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Midwestern University , Downers Grove, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1857-4312
Midwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most toxic DNA lesions and can be repaired accurately through homologous recombination (HR). HR requires processing of the DNA ends by nucleases (DNA end resection) in order to generate the required single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) regions. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodelers are 10-15 subunit complexes that contain one ATPase (BRG1 or BRM). Multiple subunits of these complexes have recently been identified as a novel family of tumor suppressors. These complexes are capable of remodeling chromatin by pushing nucleosomes along the DNA. More recent studies have identified these chromatin remodelers as important factors in DNA repair. Using the DR-U2OS reporter system, we show that the down regulation of BRG1 significantly reduces HR efficiency, while BRM has a minor effect. Inactivation of BRG1 impairs DSB repair and results in a defect in DNA end resection, as measured by the amount of BrdU-containing ssDNA generated after DNA damage. Inactivation of BRG1 also impairs the activation of the ATR kinase, reduces the levels of chromatin-bound RPA, and reduces the number of RPA and RAD51 foci after DNA damage. This defect in DNA end resection is explained by the defective recruitment of GFP-CtIP to laser-induced DSBs in the absence of BRG1. Importantly, we show that BRG1 reduces nucleosome density at DSBs. Finally, inactivation of BRG1 renders cells sensitive to anti-cancer drugs that induce DSBs. This study identifies BRG1 as an important factor for HR, which suggests that BRG1-mutated cancers have a DNA repair vulnerability that can be exploited therapeutically.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA DamageDNA End-Joining RepairDNA HelicasesDown-RegulationEndodeoxyribonucleasesHumansNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA HelicasesEndodeoxyribonucleasesNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesRBBP8 protein, humanReplication Protein ARPA1 protein, humanSMARCA4 protein, humanSWI-SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complexTranscription Factorschromatin remodelersDNA end resectionDSB repairgenomic instabilityhomologous recombinationSWI/SNF

Identifiers

PMID33044911
PMCPMC7714457
OpenAlexW3092380922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.