Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33044733›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

Quantitative Chest CT analysis in discriminating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 patients.

Damiano Caruso, Michela Polici, Marta Zerunian, Francesco Pucciarelli, Tiziano Polidori, Gisella Guido, Carlotta Rucci, Benedetta Bracci, Emanuele Muscogiuri, Chiara De Dominicis and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A retrospective study ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Radiologists' Burnout in the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Damiano CarusoDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Michela PoliciDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Marta ZerunianDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PucciarelliDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Tiziano PolidoriDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Gisella GuidoDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Carlotta RucciDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Benedetta BracciDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele MuscogiuriDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Chiara De DominicisDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Andrea LaghiDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy. andrea.laghi@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3091-7819
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 pneumonia is characterized by ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidations on Chest CT, although these CT features cannot be considered specific, at least on a qualitative analysis. The aim is to evaluate if Quantitative Chest CT could provide reliable information in discriminating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom March 31, 2020 until April 18, 2020, patients with Chest CT suggestive for interstitial pneumonia were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups based on positive/negative COVID-19 RT-PCR results. Patients with pulmonary resection and/or CT motion artifacts were excluded. Quantitative Chest CT analysis was performed with a dedicated software that provides total lung volume, healthy parenchyma, GGOs, consolidations and fibrotic alterations, expressed both in liters and percentage. Two radiologists in consensus revised software analysis and adjusted areas of lung impairment in case of non-adequate segmentation. Data obtained were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Performance of statistically significant parameters was tested by ROC curve analysis.

resultsFinal population enrolled included 190 patients: 136 COVID-19 patients (87 male, 49 female, mean age 66 ± 16) and 54 non-COVID-19 patients (25 male, 29 female, mean age 63 ± 15). Lung quantification in liters showed significant differences between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients for GGOs (0.55 ± 0.26L vs 0.43 ± 0.23L, p = 0.0005) and fibrotic alterations (0.05 ± 0.03 L vs 0.04 ± 0.03 L, p < 0.0001). ROC analysis of GGOs and fibrotic alterations showed an area under the curve of 0.661 (cutoff 0.39 L, 68% sensitivity and 59% specificity, p < 0.001) and 0.698 (cutoff 0.02 L, 86% sensitivity and 44% specificity, p < 0.001), respectively.

conclusionsQuantification of GGOs and fibrotic alterations on Chest CT could be able to identify patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoughCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingDiagnosis, DifferentialDyspneaFemaleFeverHumansLungLung Diseases, InterstitialMaleMiddle AgedChest CTCOVID-19Interstitial pneumoniaQuantitative Chest CT analysis

Identifiers

PMID33044733
PMCPMC7548413
OpenAlexW3092551330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.