Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33044689›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2020

Sex Differences in Cancer Cachexia.

Xiaoling Zhong, Teresa A Zimmers

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoling ZhongDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Teresa A ZimmersDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. zimmerst@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7872-0540
Indiana University Health · USRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI David W Clapp · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
PQB3: Mechanisms & Targeting of Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Muscle Wasting of Cancer CachexiaR01CA194593 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ZIMMERS, TERESA A · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
Morbidity, Mortality and Mechanisms of Persistent Muscle Wasting due to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-AAA CachexiaR21AR074908 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KONIARIS, LEONIDAS G., ZIMMERS, TERESA A · 2019 to 2020
$381k
Molecular Mechanisms of Muscle and Fat Wasting in Pancreatic Cancer CachexiaI01BX004177 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERS, TERESA A · 2018 to 2021
–
Tumor tissue crosstalk in the macroenvironment of pancreatic cancer cachexiaI01CX002046 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERS, TERESA A · 2020 to 2024
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004177CSRD VA I01 CX002046NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194593NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR074908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCachexia, a feature of cancer and other chronic diseases, is marked by progressive weight loss and skeletal muscle wasting. This review aims to highlight the sex differences in manifestations of cancer cachexia in patients, rodent models, and our current understanding of the potential mechanisms accounting for these differences. RECENT

findingsMale cancer patients generally have higher prevalence of cachexia, greater weight loss or muscle wasting, and worse outcomes compared with female cancer patients. Knowledge is increasing about sex differences in muscle fiber type and function, mitochondrial metabolism, global gene expression and signaling pathways, and regulatory mechanisms at the levels of sex chromosomes vs. sex hormones; however, it is largely undetermined how such sex differences directly affect the susceptibility to stressors leading to muscle wasting in cancer cachexia. Few studies have investigated basic mechanisms underlying sex differences in cancer cachexia. A better understanding of sex differences would improve cachexia treatment in both sexes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCachexiaFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsSex FactorsAnimalsCachexia/etiologyCachexia/pathologyHumansNeoplasms/complicationsSex characteristics

Identifiers

PMID33044689
PMCPMC7732790
OpenAlexW3092647786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.