Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33044656›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020

[Hemato-oncology and intensive care medicine : From taboo to indispensable].

P Wohlfarth, P Schellongowski, Arbeitsgruppe für Hämato-Onkologische Intensivmedizin der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (ÖGIAIN); Initiative „Intensive Care in Hematologic and Oncologic Patients“ (iCHOP)

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P WohlfarthIntensivstation 13i2, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.
P SchellongowskiIntensivstation 13i2, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. peter.schellongowski@meduniwien.ac.at.
Arbeitsgruppe für Hämato-Onkologische Intensivmedizin der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (ÖGIAIN); Initiative „Intensive Care in Hematologic and Oncologic Patients“ (iCHOP)
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensivists are confronted with a broad spectrum of specific clinical problems while caring for critically ill cancer patients. These include defining proper goals of intensive care treatment, managing acute respiratory failure with diverse differential considerations, treating immunologic side-effects of ever new and innovative cancer therapies, as well as numerous clinical scenarios which may exclusively arise in cancer patients. To help clinicians handle such challenges, the initiative Intensive Care in Hematologic and Oncologic Patients (iCHOP) has been dealing with these topics for several years. Supported by several Austrian and German medical societies of intensive care medicine, hematology and oncology, the first "Consensus statement for cancer patients requiring intensive care support" has only recently been released. Acute respiratory failure and its management continues to be a major focus in critically ill cancer patients due to its frequency and its prognostic impact. While noninvasive oxygenation strategies were considered the gold standard of therapy, more recent high-quality data do not show clinical benefits of such techniques including high flow nasal oxygen. On the contrary, several studies revealed an unidentified etiology of an acute respiratory failure as the only potentially modifiable risk factor for adverse outcome. Consequently, evidence-based and rigorously applied diagnostic algorithms are of utmost importance in these patients. Furthermore, intensivists are increasingly confronted with the rising incidence of various and new immunotherapy-associated toxicities and their management.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeTabooAustriaCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansAcute respiratory failureCanceriCHOPImmunotherapyIntensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID33044656
PMCPMC7549082
OpenAlexW3092588000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.