Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33044610›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

EEG-derived pain threshold index for prediction of postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic urological surgery: a comparison with surgical pleth index.

Ruijing Wang, Yixu Deng, Shoujing Zhou, Jun Zhang

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploration of Perioperative Sleep Disturbance in 208 Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruijing Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Yixu Deng *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Shoujing ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. snapzhang@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-0427
Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently a novel pain recognition indicator derived from electroencephalogram(EEG) signals, pain threshold index(PTI) has been developed. The aim of this study was to determine whether PTI can be used for prediction of postoperative acute pain while surgical pleth index(SPI) applied as control. Eighty patients undergoing laparoscopic urological surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Data of SPI, PTI and a sedative index-wavelet index(WLI) were recorded within last 10 min at the end of surgery. The postoperative pain scores (NRS, numerical rating scale) were obtained. The Bland-Altman analysis was used for evaluation of consistency between PTI and SPI, whereas receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used for the mean values of PTI, SPI, and WLI to distinguish between mild (NRS 0-3) and moderate-severe (NRS 4-10) pain, and calculate their "best-fit" cut-off values. Data from 76 patients were included for final analysis. There was a good agreement between SPI and PTI values at the end of surgery. The ROC analysis showed a cut-off PTI value of 53 to discriminate between mild and moderate-to-severe pain, while SPI is 44 for this discrimination. Further analysis indicated that PTI had a best predictive accuracy reflected by highest area under curve (AUC)(0.772, 95% CI: 0.661-0.860)with sensitivity(62.50%) and specificity(90.91%) and a best positive predictive value(83.3%,95% CI: 68.4-98.2%). PTI obtained at the end of surgery, which have better predictive accuracy for postoperative pain than SPI, could differentiate the patients with moderate-to-severe pain from those with mild pain after they awaken from anesthesia.Clinical trial registration Chinese Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR1900024789.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPain ThresholdAnesthesia, GeneralElectroencephalographyHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesNociceptive stimuliPain threshold indexPostoperative painSurgical pleth indexWavelet algorithm

Identifiers

PMID33044610
OpenAlexW3091996729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.