Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33044537›Full record

SynthesisTranslational behavioral medicine2020

A systematic review of the implementation of obesity prevention interventions in early childcare and education settings using the RE-AIM framework.

Jennifer C Sanchez-Flack, Annie Herman, Joanna Buscemi, Angela Kong, Alexis Bains, Marian L Fitzgibbon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Policy, system, and environmental interventions addressing obesity and diet-related outcomes in early childhood education settings: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer C Sanchez-FlackInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Annie HermanDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joanna BuscemiDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Angela KongDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexis BainsDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, College of Applied Health, Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marian L FitzgibbonDepartment of Pediatrics and University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

UIC CANCER PREVENTION &CONTROL RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTR25CA057699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FITZGIBBON, MARIAN L. · 1992 to 2017
$8.2M
Cancer Health Equity Career Development ProgramT32CA057699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Marian L. Fitzgibbon · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057699NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous systematic reviews have examined the efficacy of obesity prevention interventions within early childcare/education settings. Often lacking in these reviews is reporting on external validity, which continues to be underemphasized compared to internal validity. More attention to external validity would help better translate evidence-based interventions to real-world settings. This systematic review aimed to determine the availability of data on both internal and external validity across dimensions of the Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework in studies reporting on obesity prevention interventions in early childcare/education settings. Inclusion criteria included: randomized controlled trials, early childcare/education setting, targeted children 2-6 years old, addressed both diet and physical activity, collected measures of weight status and diet and/or physical activity, and published within the last 10 years. Searches were conducted in ERIC, PsychInfo, and PubMed; 23 studies met inclusion criteria. A validated RE-AIM abstraction tool was used to code studies. Most commonly reported dimensions were Reach (62.3%), Implementation (53.5%), and Efficacy/Effectiveness (48.7%). Adoption (21.7%) and Maintenance (11.6%) were less often reported. All studies reported on primary outcomes, but few reported on RE-AIM indicators of characteristics of participation and adoption, quality of life, methods used to identify staff, staff inclusion/exclusion criteria and adoption rates, implementation fidelity, measures of cost to start-up and deliver the intervention, and indicators of maintenance. This systematic review underscores the need for more focus on external validity to inform replication, dissemination, and implementation so that evidence-based early childcare/education obesity interventions can be generalized to real-world settings.

Indexed as

Child RearingHealth PromotionQuality of LifeSchool Health ServicesChildChild, PreschoolDiet, HealthyExerciseHumansObesityEarly childcare and educationExternal validityImplementationObesityRE-AIM frameworkSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33044537
PMCPMC7549410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.