Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33043370›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Determining sample size and length of follow-up for smartphone-based digital phenotyping studies.

Ian Barnett, John Torous, Harrison T Reeder, Justin Baker, Jukka-Pekka Onnela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Detecting adolescent depression through passive monitoring of linguistic markers in smartphone communication.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian BarnettDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John TorousDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harrison T ReederDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Justin BakerDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jukka-Pekka OnnelaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Robust Predictors of Mania and PsychosisU01MH116925 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, JUSTIN T, RAUCH, SCOTT L · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Using mobile phones for social and behavioral sensing of mood disorder patientsDP2MH103909 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ONNELA, JUKKA-PEKKA · 2013 to 2013
$2.4M
Statistical methods in mHealth to signal interventional needs for mental health patientsR01MH116884 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARNETT, IAN JAMES · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Digital Phenotyping for Computational Models of Relapse Prediction in Early Course PsychosisK23MH116130 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOROUS, JOHN · 2018 to 2021
$872k
NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH103909NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH116130NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116884NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudies that use patient smartphones to collect ecological momentary assessment and sensor data, an approach frequently referred to as digital phenotyping, have increased in popularity in recent years. There is a lack of formal guidelines for the design of new digital phenotyping studies so that they are powered to detect both population-level longitudinal associations as well as individual-level change points in multivariate time series. In particular, determining the appropriate balance of sample size relative to the targeted duration of follow-up is a challenge. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used data from 2 prior smartphone-based digital phenotyping studies to provide reasonable ranges of effect size and parameters. We considered likelihood ratio tests for generalized linear mixed models as well as for change point detection of individual-level multivariate time series.

resultsWe propose a joint procedure for sequentially calculating first an appropriate length of follow-up and then a necessary minimum sample size required to provide adequate power. In addition, we developed an accompanying accessible sample size and power calculator. DISCUSSION: The 2-parameter problem of identifying both an appropriate sample size and duration of follow-up for a longitudinal study requires the simultaneous consideration of 2 analysis methods during study design.

conclusionThe temporally dense longitudinal data collected by digital phenotyping studies may warrant a variety of applicable analysis choices. Our use of generalized linear mixed models as well as change point detection to guide sample size and study duration calculations provide a tool to effectively power new digital phenotyping studies.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentLongitudinal StudiesSample SizeSmartphoneTelemedicineHumansModels, StatisticalResearch Designdigital phenotypinglongitudinal studiesmobile healthsample sizestudy design

Identifiers

PMID33043370
PMCPMC7727382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.