Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33043368›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

User-centered design of a longitudinal care plan for children with medical complexity.

Arti D Desai, Grace Wang, Julia Wignall, Dylan Kinard, Vidhi Singh, Sherri Adams, Wanda Pratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of an electronic system for self/proxy symptom tracking alongside children with cancer and their caregivers: a co-design exemplar.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arti D DesaiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Grace WangSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Julia WignallSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Dylan KinardSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Vidhi SinghSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sherri AdamsDivision of Paediatric Medicine, SickKids, Toronto, Canada.
Wanda PrattThe Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Web-based Care Plans for Children with Medical ComplexityK08HS024299 · AHRQ · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI DESAI, ARTI D · 2015 to 2019
$741k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the content priorities and design preferences for a longitudinal care plan (LCP) among caregivers and healthcare providers who care for children with medical complexity (CMC) in acute care settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted iterative one-on-one design sessions with CMC caregivers (ie, parents/legal guardians) and providers from 5 groups: complex care, primary care, subspecialists, emergency care, and care coordinators. Audio-recorded sessions included content categorization activities, drawing exercises, and scenario-based testing of an electronic LCP prototype. We applied inductive content analysis of session materials to elicit content priorities and design preferences between sessions. Analysis informed iterative prototype revisions.

resultsWe conducted 30 design sessions (10 with caregivers, 20 with providers). Caregivers expressed high within-group variability in their content priorities compared to provider groups. Emergency providers had the most unique content priorities among clinicians. We identified 6 key design preferences: a familiar yet customizable layout, a problem-based organization schema, linked content between sections, a table layout for most sections, a balance between unstructured and structured data fields, and use of family-centered terminology. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will inform enhancements of electronic health record-embedded LCPs and the development of new LCP tools and applications. The design preferences we identified provide a framework for optimizing integration of family and provider content priorities while maintaining a user-tailored experience.

conclusionHealth information platforms that incorporate these design preferences into electronic LCPs will help meet the information needs of caregivers and providers caring for CMC in acute care settings.

Indexed as

CaregiversElectronic Health RecordsPatient Care PlanningUser-Centered DesignUser-Computer InterfaceChildChronic DiseaseHealth PersonnelHumansLegal GuardiansParentsPediatricscare coordinationchronic diseasehealth information exchangehospital medicinepatient care planningpatient portalspediatricstransitional careuser-computer interface

Identifiers

PMID33043368
PMCPMC7727350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.