ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2020
Neurophysiological Correlates of Frequency, Concreteness, and Iconicity in American Sign Language.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Processing in Sign Languages: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Iconicity and transparency in Dutch Sign Language.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- The neural response to highly iconic signs in hearing learners and deaf signers.Brain and language · 2026Article
- A lexical database of British Sign Language (BSL) and German Sign Language (DGS): Iconicity ratings, iconic strategies, and concreteness norms.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Words and Worlds Both: Dynamic Effects of Distributional and Sensorimotor Information in Semantic Processing.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- FLexSign: A lexical database in French Sign Language (LSF).Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Neural effects differ for learning highly iconic versus non-iconic signs in hearing adults.Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Letters, Words, Sentences, and Reading.Journal of cognition · 2024Review
- Electrophysiological patterns of visual word recognition in deaf and hearing readers: An ERP mega-study.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2023Article
- The effects of multiple linguistic variables on picture naming in American Sign Language.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Are form priming effects phonological or perceptual? Electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.Cognition · 2022Article
- Tracking the time course of sign recognition using ERP repetition priming.Psychophysiology · 2022Article
- New Perspectives on the Neurobiology of Sign Languages.Frontiers in communication · 2021Article
- Matching pictures and signs: An ERP study of the effects of iconic structural alignment in American sign language.Neuropsychologia · 2021Article
- Sign Language: How the Brain Represents Phonology without Sound.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
- The Neural Network for Sign Language Comprehension.Language and linguistics compassArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate possible universal and modality-specific factors that influence the neurophysiological response during lexical processing, we recorded event-related potentials while a large group of deaf adults (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.